Sunday, June 5, 2011

8 babies removed from care home

June 4 2011




Jenny Berger
 
Just days ago, Jenny Berger’s care home in Pinelands was filled with the cries and laughter of 11 babies for whom she provided a temporary home. But on Friday, as she handed over the last eight babies in her care, an unfamiliar quiet settled over the house. 

On Tuesday, two of the babies died in their cots at the Building Blocks temporary foster home. Another was returned to her father on Friday. 

The provincial Department of Social Development removed the eight remaining children – some toddlers, others babies not more than a few months old – late on Friday. They were taken to a place of safety in Langa, said Bruce Oom, spokesman for the acting MEC for Social Development, Bonginkosi Madikizela. 

Tears streamed down Berger’s face as she handed over the babies, who were swathed in blankets. Among them was “Baby Miracle”, a child who was pulled alive from a manhole near Killarney Gardens by truck driver Desmond Mutengo last October. At the time, the infant was only days old. 





Several of Berger’s friends and family turned up to support her, including Victoria Lockwood, former wife of Princess Diana’s brother Earl Spencer. 






Police told media on Thursday that the two babies had died of natural causes, apparently just 45 minutes apart. But this was contradicted on Friday by Madikizela, who insisted the babies had died of “unnatural causes”. 

                              MEC for Social Development, Bonginkosi Madikizela.

This infuriated Berger, who said the pathologist who’d performed the autopsies had described the cause of death as “undetermined”. Further tests would have to be carried out. 

Berger said that after receiving legal advice, she and London-based Building Blocks chairwoman Kim Killeen had decided to release the remaining eight babies from their care pending the outcome of these tests. 

“Because they say they have a document indicating unnatural death, we have decided to advise Social Development to come and remove the children,” said Berger. 

“It’s going to kill me; it’s going totally destroy me, but I have to do it in the light of all the stories they’re making up. Every hour there’s a different story.” 

Social workers tried to remove the babies late on Thursday night, but were deterred by police.
In a statement on Friday, Madikizela said the babies were removed “as a precautionary measure pending finalisation of the police investigation”. 

“The causes of the deaths are under investigation and will remain so until the post-mortem findings have been made by the pathologists,” she said. 

“That said, the sudden and unexplained deaths of these infants necessitates that the department take precautionary steps in the best interests of the babies and young children in temporary safe care still at Building Blocks.” 

She said an inquiry had been launched into the conduct of the police officers who thwarted social workers’ attempts to remove the babies on Thursday night. 

The care home has been in operation for just over three years, with more than 80 babies passing through its doors. 

Berger also has three foster children in her care, who have remained with her. 

Meanwhile, the Manenberg Health Committee has responded to concerns raised by the community over two children who died after being vaccinated at the local Manenberg Clinic this week. 

Community members were so angry after the deaths that a crowd gathered at the clinic and police had to be called. 

In a statement, the committee said: “Due to a staff shortage at the clinic the staff is under pressure. 

“Complaints about staff attitude and service are dealt with by the health committee and raised with the facility manager immediately. If the issue is not dealt with, we take it to higher level. 

“However, the attitude of some community members towards the staff at the clinic cannot be excused. 

“Staff are sworn at on a daily basis. African nurses are constantly being called the K-word. For this reason, nurses are reluctant to come and work at this clinic,” said the statement. 




R30m licensing funds scam boils over

June 5 2011

More than R30 million of the Joburg licensing and traffic department’s revenue has disappeared in the biggest cash management scandal to ever rock the Joburg Metro Police Department. 


But more than three years after the missing millions saga was first uncovered no criminal charges have been laid against the culprits. 


 
Johannesburg metro police chief 
Chris Ngcobo addresses the media on corruption


Instead, the JMPD commissioned forensic auditors Nkonki Consulting last year, who could only point fingers at nine licensing staffers, among them cashiers whose combined liability in the scandal amounts to less than R1m. 

Nkonki Consulting was appointed by JMPD chief Chris Ngcobo to probe, among others, staff members involved in possible misappropriation of funds, financial misconduct and to quantify the irregularities. However, in many of their findings against the identified staff, the forensic auditors did not recommend any criminal action due to lack of “any prima facie evidence” of defrauding the JMPD. 

According to documents handed to Nkonki auditors, which the Saturday Star has seen, the problem of a lack of bank reconciliations for both traffic and licensing is a long-standing one. 

In one letter submitted to the auditors as evidence, Anton Klarbach, deputy director of finance at JMPD, wrote to his subordinate warning that more than R30m had not been accounted for on the licensing bank statement. 

In their progress report last September on the money totalling over R853 000 linked to the nine employees, Nkonki investigators established that this had been due to transactions that could not balance. The shortages were due to either cash disappearance, the use of fraudulent cheques and cloned bank cards used to register vehicles at Sandton, Loveday and Rosettenville licensing centres. 

The drama of the JMPD’s missing millions scandal came to a head this week when the SA Municipal Workers Union (Samwu) wrote to new Mayor Parks Tau and the city manager requesting them to appoint a commission of inquiry to probe the licensing saga. 

Samwu has charged that disciplinary processes against nine of its members, two of whom won their cases on appeal, were designed to “cover up management’s ineptitude towards the dysfunctional licensing department”. 

Only one employee implicated in the Nkonki report has been found guilty by the JMPD’s internal disciplinary process and fired while another has been demoted to a junior position, according to the union. 

The remaining workers out of the nine charged are still fighting their cases internally. 

“The losses of money in the licensing department amounted to millions of rands over a period of years with senior management aware of the status quo,” said Samwu’s strike organiser Jack Mokalapa. 

“The appointment of Nkonki was a feeble cover-up exercise... which could not explain the whereabouts of millions still unaccounted for.” 

Mokalapa said the money that had not been accounted for could now be more than R50m, depending on who you spoke to. 

Samwu has threatened an indefinite strike action if the city does not meet its demand over the licensing money saga and other labour issues it said were not addressed by JMPD management.

http://www.iol.co.za/news/crime-courts/r30m-licensing-funds-scam-boils-over-1.1078670 

Blankets, pots and bundles of cash - lots of it

Jun 5, 2011

New fiancée joins queue to wed Ngema - yes you read this right! joins the queue!!!

Blankets, pots and bundles of cash - lots of it - were just some of the gifts given playwright Mbongeni Ngema's fiancée, radio personality Nonhlanhla Buthelezi, at their traditional engagement ceremony in Dokodweni, northern KwaZulu-Natal, yesterday. 

More than 300 guests in designer outfits braved the scorching heat, arriving in luxury sedans to celebrate the couple's umkhehlo ceremony.

The ceremony is a rite of passage for a woman about to get married. 

According to custom, it is a sign to the community that the woman is now an adult and any prospective husband wanting to ask for her hand in marriage may approach. 


Guests were treated to a traditional menu consisting of samp, pap, freshly slaughtered meat, madumbi and sweet potatoes. 

The marquee was decked out in traditional decor. 

Guests included provincial welfare MEC Meshack Hadebe and Ukhozi FM sports presenter Ivan Hlophe. 

Buthelezi, 35, who had taken time off from her lunch-time show at Ukhozi FM to prepare for the ceremony, wore a traditional outfit which included genuine cow hide, a Zulu hat and a colourful beaded necklace and bracelets. 

Buthelezi, who performed a few traditional dances, was presented with a spear while relatives sang. She was accompanied at her parent's home by more than 100 young men carrying Zulu shields who sang and danced. 

Buthelezi is one of four women engaged to Ngema, creator of the award-winning musical Sarafina. 

He is due to marry Nompumelelo Gumede, Saleha Nxumalo and Cat Mpanza later this year. The dates of the ceremonies have yet to be announced. 

He was previously married to Pretoria State Theatre chief executive Xoliswa Ngema, actress Cebisile Mpungose, and former Generations actress Leleti Khumalo. 

Ngema, who has often attracted controversy with his plays and lifestyle, is divorced from all three. 

Buthelezi recently said she did not have a problem with being in a polygamous marriage because she respected culture and appreciated the way things were done in the past. 

"I believe that a man can have more than one wife and that is why I have no shame in entering into a polygamous marriage," she said.

Friday, June 3, 2011

South Africa: It Was Just Time For Change

Mike Smith - 12/21/2007

On South African television the interviewer asks a black man, "So whom do you want to win the ANC leadership election and why?"

He answers, "Jacob Zuma, because I think it is time for a change".

Ten years ago I heard almost those exact same words coming from a White, British man. I asked him, "So whom do you want to win, John Major (conservative) or Tony Blair (liberal)?"

His answer was, "Tony Blair, because it is time for a change".

That answer came as a shock to me.

I could not believe that such an intelligent and educated man could come up with such a lousy reason. He was not the only one who had "a change" as a reason for voting Labour. History shows us it was the biggest electoral defeats since 1832. In the end their own supporters voted the conservatives out, because they thought, "it was time for a change".

After ten years of liberal policy in the United Kingdom, what do we have? Increased levels of crime, virtually uncontrolled immigration, Muslims rioting and protesting in the streats… and so on. First the UK had colonies, now they ARE the colony. They are being colonized by their former colonies. Yes, thanks to voting for "a change".

Strange how people can always equate "a change" with a shift in the right direction. Why can it not mean a shift in the WRONG direction?

Zuma has many supporters; from the figures I saw it looks like a two third majority. Many of his supporters are full of hope. They see him as the hero who will fix everything. Not for one moment do they think that things can go horribly wrong for them. When you suggest in that direction, even whites say that things can’t get worse than it was under Mbeki!

How I laugh at these poor sods.

Mugabe was once seen as a "moderate" and praised by 80 percent of Zimbabweans, including many whites.

When Stalin took over from Lenin, many people had many good things to say about him. They also said it can’t get any worse than things was under Lenin. How wrong they were. Stalin killed more than 15 million of his own citizens.

Let us see what legacy Zuma leaves behind.



Expect the following in the next five to ten years:

· The constitution to be changed;

· Aids cases to double;

· Crime to escalate to at least three times current levels;

· Mines and big businesses to be Nationalized;

· The economy to crash along with the currency;

· Education to crash;

· Health care to crash;

· White’s farms and businesses to be confiscated and handed over to blacks;

· White’s houses to be confiscated and handed over to blacks;

· Citizens to be disarmed further;

· Freedom of speech to disappear;

· Travel restrictions on citizens;

· Genocide and attempted genocide against groups considered traditionally hostile to the state, such as Afrikaners, Indians and Coloureds (as Mugabe did with thirty thousand Matabeles in 1983);

· Animals in National parks to be slaughtered en masse.

Yes people… you think South Africa Sucks? You aint seen nothing yet. The sooner you start preparing yourself for the future, the better. Start thinking about contingencies; start thinking "Worst Case Scenario"! Bad, just got worse.


http://www.globalpolitician.com/23909-south-africa

Labor Negotiations with the ANC

Mike Smith - 12/27/2007

In a recent article (http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1&click_id=6&art_id=nw20071223125941883C707494), the boys from Solidarity, Flip Buys, Dirk Herman, Kallie Kriel and other predominantly-white unions claimed to believe that they can bargain with the ANC. But to bargain successfully or even negotiate, you have to have some kind of leverage. You must have either money, numbers of people or superior weaponry. Why would Jacob Zuma and the ANC even listen to Solidarity??

Solidarity has nothing; Not a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of. No money, no masses of people and certainly no weapons.

How can you bargain for a higher salary when you are unemployed? What are you going to fall back on when the deal falls through? Who stands to lose the most from the deal falling through?

Can you see my point? You never bargain from a point of a real need. Sun Tzu says you first win the war and then you go to battle.

The mistake these Afrikaner “Academics and Intelligentsia” makes is that they do not believe the Communist Tripartite Alliance (ANC, SACP, Cosatu) are their enemies. They honestly believe these people are reasonable human beings who will listen to their Afrikaner concerns. Dirk Herman wrote a little booklet on how to implement Affirmative action “Fairly”, called the “Good Practice guide to Affirmative Action” ( not sure about the exact title, My copy is…somewhere…) . What a crock. Even he admitted later that it was a failure and the ANC wiped their arsses with it.

Why should the ANC listen to Solidarity? It is not their people who suffer under Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment. It is not their language and schools coming under attack. The ANC have nothing to negotiate for. They have everything already! So why should they even bother wasting time to come to the negotiating table? Solidarity will just be wasting their time.

I know how Solidarity will negotiate with the ANC. They want to propose a deal that will be beneficial to both sides; a win-win negotiation. They want to come with their western, capitalistic approach and show the ANC that both can walk away being winners. They are going to come up with the usual “Goals, Trade-offs, Alternatives, etc” nonsense of negotiating, that one gets taught on a two day course.

The truth is that the ANC is not interested. Just the fact that these Afrikaners want to bargain or negotiate is a sign of weakness to the ANC. If the Afrikaners had any balls they would first fight and then negotiate. All the ANC policies are aimed at total destruction of Whites in South Africa; their main focus is the Afrikaner; more particular …”The Afrikaner Intelligentsia”.

I cannot believe these so called Afrikaner leaders have not figured this elementary principle of warfare out. Karl von Clausewitz writes about it extensively in his books.

“Trace the ultimate substance of enemy strength to the fewest possible sources; compress the attack on these sources to the fewest possible actions; and subordinate minor actions as much as possible.” – On War, KvC.

In simple terms, “Strike the shepherd and the sheep will scatter”.

I am sure the Communists are au fait with Von Clausewitz and Sun Tzu. It is amazing that these so called Afrikaner leaders are such idiots.

Yes, Flip, Dirk and Kallie…start realizing that the YOU are the fly in the ointment to the ANC. They are coming after you and all your “Intelligentsia” buddies in the Afrikanerbond. They won’t stop until the last one of you is out of this country. You are the biggest threat to them, which is why they want you gone.

Over the last 15 years, the ANC have bribed, conned and lied the Afrikaners out of their leadership. What we sit wit now are the dregs that are left over.

Either this Afrikaner Intelligentsia is amazingly stupid or they are just pretending to put up a fight against the ANC. Are they already in the pockets of the opposition? Maybe they should come out and tell us what the hell is really going on? Are they being paid to put up a WWF-wrestling show for us? Dare I say, a mock fight? I would really like to know.

If these Afrikaner leaders are really interested in negotiating, they should first study their opponents and their opponent’s tactics carefully. Then, after they have formulated a strategy of their own, get some leverage. Then, and only then…you go to the negotiating table. Your opponent should be the one wanting to negotiate…not you. In fact, your opponent should be begging for negotiations, not you.

What these “Afrikaner Intelligentsia” of Solidarity, Afri-forum and the Afrikanerbond do not realize or do not want to acknowledge is that their enemies are bent on their total annihilation while they (the Arikaners) merely want to survive. These Afrikaners want to pretend that there are no wolves attacking the sheep. The flock will never be able to graze freely and in peace, unless the Afrikaners have some Sheepdogs protecting the perimeter against the wolves.

Unless they change their strategy and tactics drastically, the ANC will be forever walking over them. Maybe the first thing they have to do is acknowledge how deep they are in the brown smelly stuff. Work from there. Work themselves into a better position, later into a dominant position, only then can they go for a choke or a submission.

In the mean time I can see the ANC scoffing and laughing at these amateurs; me too.

A Call for White Unity in South Africa

Mike Smith - 10/28/2009
I sick and tired of this Soutpiel/Dutchie s*! In my life I have learned that the English speaking South Africans basically have two gripes… ”I was bullied by Dutchman(Afrikaners) at school”…or… ”My Dutchman officers in the army gave me a hard time”….

Oh and by the way their excuse for not being able to speak Afrikaans after learning it at school for twelve years is always, “They laughed at me when I tried to speak Afrikaans, so I just thought… stuff them”.

So the “Engelsman” is always playing the victim. Shame the Afrikaners always gave them a hard time, ever since the Boer war. The English speaking South Africans have some other gripes and belly aches as well such as the “Verkrampte” Afrikaner churches and politicians were traitors and backstabbers and sold out all whites in South Africa. It is today easy to blame the politicians of the NP who were almost all Afrikaners for the situation of South Africa today, but who were the actual voters and how did they vote in the 1992 referendum?

Maybe it is time we look at these issues in an honest, objective and open-minded manner.

Growing up during Apartheid in South Africa, my experience was that the English people were always the liberal ones. The English neighbour next door always voted for the PFP (Progressive Federal Party) who was incidently led by Dr Fredirik van Zyl Slabbert, a liberal Afrikaner academic. The Afrikaners almost exclusively voted for the National Party and a few for the Conservative Party of Dr. Treurnicht. I never met an Afrikaner who EVER voted for the PFP who were once the official opposition after the CP took over that job in 1987. Even Wikipedia says that the PFP drew support mostly from the liberal English speaking Whites in South Africa.

If South African Whites are 50% Afrikaners and 50% English then some interesting facts emerge.

The official results were, 68,73% for the yes vote to give the country over to Blacks and 31.27% voted “No”. In Cape Town and Durban where English is in the majority and Afrikaners are much more liberal, 85% voted yes. In the Transvaal only about 52-57% of all the whites voted Yes and one needs to note that Afrikaners in this area are the majority.

It appears that almost all the English people voted yes and about one third of Afrikaners voted Yes. Two thirds of Afrikaners voted NO in the 1992 referendum. Ultimately the blame of the referendum results does not lie with the politicians who called the referendum, but with the whites who voted YES.

The referendum results aside, let us move on the language issue. It is quite common knowledge in South Africa that Afrikaners can speak English far better than English people can speak Afrikaans. Both groups of Whites are taught from about the age of six to speak both languages. For the next twelve years at school they study both languages. Why is it that at the end of that twelve years Afrikaners are better at English than English South Africans are at Afrikaans? Simple. Most international music is in English. The best movies and television programs are in English. The perception is therefore that Afrikaans helps one nowhere so what is the need to learn it? The world is English and with English you will get a lot further than with Afrikaans. So English speaking whites treat Afrikaans as a necessary evil they have to endure throughout their school carreers and never really see any need to learn it, because in in South Africa everyone can speak English to a reasonable degree.

When one poses the question to English speaking South Africans why they are unable to speak the language after learning it at school for twelve years, one is met with the usual urban legend and myth that, “The Afrikaners laughed at me when I tried to speak Afrikaans so I gave them the middle finger and told them to stuff their language.”

This is simply not true and English speaking South Africans are not being honest with themselves or others why they could not be bothered to learn Afrikaans.

Further, I have been to Holland and Belgium and I am able to speak Afrikaans to them and they understand me 100%. I can also understand them 100%. I have also been to Aruba and Curacao where a simple greeting in Afrikaans allows one to go through customs unhindered, because they think you are Dutch, whereas the English speakers with their passports have to stand in line for hours and get searched. I experienced similar things in Surinam and Indonesia….And then I am constantly told that, “Afrikaans helps you nowhere in the world. It is simply a myth and an urban legend that holds no substance. Funny that the very first word in the Oxford Dictionary is an Afrikaans word, “Aardvark”…even more funny is that the second word, “Aardwolf” is also Afrikaans.

Then comes the church… The big bad NG Kerk is to blame for everything, when everybody forgets the Anglican Church, The Church of England, with their Black Archbishop Desmond Tutu and the overwhelmingly English speaking Roman Catholic Church’s involvement in liberation theology and their support of the Marxist terrorist ANC who are currently ruling South Africa.

The other urban legend that keeps on dividing Afrikaners and English South Africans is the one that Afrikaners gave English South Africans a hard time at school or in the army.

I once had a friend, let us call him Willie… When I first met Willie he told me how he had a business that folded and how he lost R200,000. Problem was that every time me and Willie got together for a Braai, he told me the story again, but every time the amount that he lost, doubled. Eventually Willie was telling me the same story for the umpteenth time, but by then he had lost R8 million. He was obviously bullshitting and believing his own bullshit.

If I had a Rand for every English speaking South African who ever told me how they were bullied by Afrikaners at school or in the army, I would probably have R8 million rand today. These lies and urban legends are floating out there as we are reading this, but if English speaking people in South Africa are truly honest with themselves then they will realise that these urban legends and lies that they have told to others for many years are simply not true and all bullshit.

I further actually feel very sorry for English speaking South Africans, because all the Black tribes like the Zulu’s, Xhosas, Tsawanas, etc have their own cultures. The Afrikaners have their own rich culture with their Boeremusiek, Volkspele, poems and jokes. The Afrikaners have a guy called, Jan van der Merwe whom they make jokes about, just like the Irish have Paddy or the Germans have Eullenspiegel. The Afrikaners have their own cuisine with their “Boerewors” and “Potjiekos”… But what culture does English speaking South Africans actually have? Everything they have are borrowed from other cultures. They tell South African jokes calling Jan van der Merwe, “Old Van”. No original culture ever emerged from the English on African soil.

No, it is easier to blame others and play the victim through spreading urban legends and lies.

It has come time for us Whites in South Africa to push all this bullshit aside that is dividing us and that keeps playing into the hands of our enemies. The Anglo Boer war is more than a hundred years ago and history. None of us who are alive today ever fought each other in that war. None of us were in an English concentration camp and none of us were one of the gaurds.

If we were to take stock of our current situation we will see that we have a common enemy and we are all equally deep in the s* and that our only way out is if we stand together. The time has come to bury the Lee Enfields and Mausers. We are a new generation of WHITE South Africans who are facing extinction in a country we love and call home and where we all share two common thing. BIRTHRIGHT and RACE ! That is enough for me.

http://www.globalpolitician.com/26008-south-africa 

EC Pupils Face Exam Crisis

01 June 2011 

About 600000 EC pupils have not received textbooks this year. The books were delivered to only 70 percent of pupils.

MORE than 600000 Eastern Cape pupils face sitting for their mid- year exams without having had any textbooks for the first half of the year.

And the Department of Education cannot even guarantee that everyone will have them by the end of the year.

The beleaguered provincial Education Department head, Modidima Mannya, made this shocking revelation during an education portfolio committee meeting yesterday, where the department’s report showed that textbooks had been delivered to only 70percent of the province’s two million-plus pupils.

Modidima Mannya


Until three weeks ago, the department had still not finalised a R54million tender to supply stationery to schools because it had been awarded irregularly.

The department now aims to have stationery at all schools by June, just in time for the holidays. The issue of stationery is one of the reasons that led the national department to take over the running of the ailing department, invoking Section 100 (b) of the Constitution.

In a fact-finding mission in January, Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga found the department in "total disarray" following the termination of about 6000 temporary teachers’ contracts, the suspension of scholar transport, school nutrition – and a crisis with the stationery tender.


Angie Motshekga

Cross questioned by the committee’s Nombulelo Mabandla on the crisis yesterday, Mannya said the situation was "so complex" that he could not provide timeframes of speeding up the delivery of stationery, nor could he guarantee textbooks would be available to all this year.

"We have to be honest that, as desirable as it is, circumstances might not necessarily permit ," said Mannya, adding that failure by schools to collect books from pupils at the end of the school year and dishonesty were major factors in the lapse.

"We have not activated the retrieval system for textbooks, which means that every year we buy textbooks and the children leave with them (to the next grade).

"They should actually be retrieved so that we have them (the following year) and only need to do a top up.

"We haven’t really been topping up, we’ve been replacing, which is a major problem," said Mannya.

But one portfolio committee member described the 30 percent shortfall at this time of the year as a "textbook crisis".

Provision of textbooks, adequate teachers and enough time in class (the triple T approach) were mentioned by President Jacob Zuma as an ANC and government priority.

Affected schools fall within the Section 20 category of schools whose budget is managed centrally by the department.

Inadequate numbers of textbooks is just another blow particularly to schools that are still struggling in mud structures.

Mannya took a swipe at Section 21 schools – who are allocated finances directly by the department – saying their principals were not buying textbooks though they were provided money to do so.

"I think we have had unreported problems with the Section 21 schools where we transferred money, and they haven’t done what we said they must do … Even some of the suppliers have come to see me to complain about non-payment, which in certain instances has got nothing to do with the delays in the transfer by the department."

This was contradicted by MPL Edmund van Vuuren, who defended Section 21 schools, saying department funding was grossly inadequate.


Edmund van Vuuren

Currently, Section 21 schools in the top quintile – traditionally the more affluent schools – get an annual subsidy of R147 (as opposed to the norm of R156) per pupil each year, and 45 percent of this amount should be used for textbooks, he said.

http://www.dispatch.co.za/news/article/1353 

Bid To Curb Dodgy State Lease Deals

02-Jun-2011

THE government, stung by billions of rand spent on leasing buildings, wants all state departments and entities that occupy private properties to relocate to state-owned buildings over the next three years.

 
Gwen Mahlangu-Nkabinde

Public Works Minister Gwen Mahlangu-Nkabinde said in her budget vote speech yesterday that her department had concluded that government could save billions of rand by moving departments in private properties to government buildings.


She said public works was planning to build new buildings and to maintain existing ones to make space for state departments.

Such a move could clip the wings on dodgy building lease agreements such as the controversial attempt by police chief General Bheki Cele to move SAPS headquarters to a Pretoria building owned by businessman Roux Shabangu.

 Sanlam Middestad building in Pretoria.


The Sunday Times exposed the R500million lease agreement deal entered into by Cele and Shabangu which would have seen police headquarters relocated to the latter's property at the Sanlam Middestad building in Pretoria.

Bheki Cele

But Public Protector Thuli Madonsela put the brakes on the deal when she ruled that the contract entered into with Shabangu was "improper and unlawful".

 Thuli Madonsela



Ironically, Mahlangu-Nkabinde, who approved the deal after she was appointed minister, was severely criticised by the public protector for authorising the deal.

Mahlangu-Nkabinde acknowledged yesterday, however, that the task to relocate state departments to government-owned buildings could take a while to complete.

She further told MPs that public works, in collaboration with the department of higher education and training, had decided to renovate and convert idle state buildings to provide cheap accommodation to higher education students.

So far, the HG de Witt building in Tshwane is being refurbished and will house 180 students when completed. The department is also refurbishing the Pelonomi Hospital in Bloemfontein, which will accommodate 700 students when it is ready.

Pelonomi Hospital in Bloemfontein


Meanwhile, the public works, which has been criticised by a number of government departments and officials for poor maintenance of government buildings, has promised to improve its maintenance levels.

6000 Cases Against Police

Jun 2, 2011

The Independent Complaints Directorate is investigating an estimated 6000 cases against the police, the ICD's executive director Francois Beukman said in Pretoria on Thursday. 

 
Francois Beukman 

Addressing the National Press Club, Beukman said that of the 6000 cases, he estimated that 2500 were criminal cases.

ICD spokesman Moses Dlamini said 40 percent of the cases were criminal matters, the majority of which were crimes such as assault, murder, attempted murder and assault occasioning grevious bodily harm. 


Dlamini said that very often police training came up as an issue during such cases.
Currently the ICD had 292 service staff and about 100 investigative officers, Beukman said. 

 

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Says he who's wife has been found quilty of drug trafficing!!

Illegal economy costing SA billions

Cape Town - The illicit economy is costing South Africa billions and biting hard into the country's gross domestic product (GDP), State Security Minister Siyabonga Cwele said on Thursday.

"In 2010 we reported the loss in the gold industry amounting to R6.7bn," he told the National Assembly during debate on his budget vote.

"We have, with the cooperation and collaboration of other government departments, subsequently scoped the extent of the illicit economy which is estimated to be about 10% of our GDP, quantified to a loss of about R178bn to the economy," he said.

The illicit economy had the potential to seriously compromise the new economic growth path and was costing South Africa hundreds of thousands of jobs.

The scoping exercise revealed that this economic threat was rife in the mining, textile and tobacco industries, he said.

"These illicit activities create unfair competition to legitimate businesses and industries, erode the corporate tax base, distort trade, violate foreign exchange regulations, and create conducive conditions for espionage.

"This year, the security and economic clusters will focus on attracting and developing specialised skills and sophisticated technologies to counter this illicit economy," Cwele said.

At a media briefing earlier, director general Jeff Maqetuka said the illicit economy could be "even bigger than we think", because investigations are still continuing.

http://www.fin24.com/Economy/Illegal-economy-costing-SA-billions-20110602