A Lesson in Mathematics South African Style

I so often read and hear people talking nonsense that things in the New South Africa will improve with time, but it seems they did not have maths at school.

Officially according to the 2011 Mid-year population estimates for South Africa, there were 50,586,757 people in this country of which only 4,565,825 (9%) were white.

According to the official statistics for 1987 the total population was 29,025,000 of which 4.911 million were whites. This means that (officially) the total population grew from 29 million in 1987 to 51 million in 2011.

Over the same period the number of whites decreased from 4,9 million to 4,6 million. (Ref. The 1988 SA Pocket Digest & SA Statistics Mid-year population estimates 2011, Release P0302)

According to Country Studies USA - SA population :

The 1980 census count was nearly 23.8 million; another 4.6 million were added to compensate for acknowledged undercounting, resulting in a nationwide population of 28.4 million. The figures excluded those living in the three homelands that were nominally independent in 1980--an estimated 2.7 million in Transkei, 1 million in Bophuthatswana, and about 350,000 in Venda. A fourth homeland, Ciskei, with a population of 678,000, became "independent" in 1981.
The next census, in 1991, took place amid unprecedented political violence. For the first time, the government used aerial photography and sample surveys to enumerate residents in eighty-eight "unrest" areas, which were otherwise inaccessible to government officials. After being adjusted for underenumeration, the 1991 census yielded a count of 30,986,920 citizens, excluding the four "independent" homelands. Residents of the other six non-independent ("self-governing") homelands--10,746,504 people--were included in the nationwide count.
In 1992 the United States Bureau of the Census estimated that 48 percent of all black South Africans, and about 1 percent of all other racial groups, lived in the ten homelands--which made up only about one-seventh of the total land area of the country. On this basis, the bureau estimated the total population of South Africa at 40.6 million.
In 1994 the South African government estimated the total nationwide population at 40.4 million, after all ten homelands had been reincorporated into South Africa. In that year, the United States Bureau of the Census estimated the total population of South Africa at 43.9 million. Relying on the South African government's enumeration and legal categories, the South African Institute of Race Relations estimated that the population was 76.4 percent black, 12.6 percent white, 8.5 percent coloured, and 2.5 percent Asian.

"The figures for 2005 put the number of white South Africans in the country at 4.3 million, 841 000 fewer than the 5.2 million of 1995." (http://www.fin24.com/Economy/Million-whites-leave-SA-study-20060924)

An average 2,35 children are born per woman in this country, while whites have been leaving by their hundreds of thousands and bearing an average of perhaps only 0.2 children per woman.

In 1989, the South African Institute of International Affairs estimated that there were 1,2 million illegal immigrants in the country. By September 1994, the most highly liberal Dr Frederik van Zyl Slabbert announced at an HSRC symposium that the number of illegal aliens in the country maybe as high as 12 (twelve) million. (http://www.queensu.ca/samp/sampresources/migrationdocuments/documents/2000/solomon.htm). Dr. Buthelezi stated the same figure in Parliament in 1995.

In 1996 independent French researcher, Marc-Antoine Perouse de Monteclos estimated that one in five of the inhabitants of townships surrounding Johannesburg was an illegal alien. In addition, he noted that by 1996 up to 70% of Berea and Hillbrow were populated by foreigners, three-quarters of whom were illegal immigrants from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). His research has also identified a small but rapidly growing illegal Rwandese community in Durban. (http://www.queensu.ca/samp/sampresources/migrationdocuments/documents/2000/solomon.htm)

According to Mr. Tokyo Sexwale the number of squatter camps have increased from around 260 in 1994 to 2,700 by 2009.

In the meantime some 8 million people cross our borders every year, the vast majority being from African states, and no one knows how many of those entering the country ever leave the country again.

It stands to reason that it would be virtually IMPOSSIBLE for South Africa to have had only 51 million people by 2011 and only someone with no common sense would believe it. According to the figures quoted by Van Zyl Slabbert and Buthelezi we would have been around 40 million by 1995 already. Also remember that according to the US figures we were already 43.9 million by 1994.

Update June 2012

SA attracts the most asylum-seekers
"Between 2003 and 2008, the Department of Home Affairs deported more than 1.4million people."

Gloves come off in SA and Nigeria diplomatic feud
"Researchers claim we’ve deported more than 2.5-million people in the past 20 years. In an ordinary week, we deport an average of 350 people."

South Africa deports 15000 as controls tighten
Passop alleges that desperate asylum-seekers buy forged border passes for R1500 each so they can apply for permits. It said about 1700 applicants receive their permits every month. This figure is much lower than the number of Zimbabweans deported every month.
"We have so far handled 14932 deportees through Beitbridge border post since the exercise resumed on October 7 last year. Between January 1 and March 2, 7177 Zimbabweans were brought back home," Charles Gwede, assistant regional manager-in-charge of Beitbridge border post, told journalists this week.

It should be obvious that with the increase in the number of squatter camps, the continuous influx of illegal immigrants from Africa at a rate of more than just a few million annually, while the whites are leaving by their tens of thousands annually, the ratio between blacks and whites in the country is increasing at an unimaginable pace.

The opportunities for whites are disappearing faster by the day, not only because of BEE and Transformation, but simply because they cannot compete against the increasing and overwhelming number of blacks in the country.

In 2000 Hussein Solomon said, "Given the current state of the economy, the negative impact of illegal aliens on the job market cannot be underestimated. In this context, it is useful to note that 34 per cent of South Africans are unemployed; that eighteen million South African citizens live in abject poverty; that fewer than seven out of every one hundred school leavers find employment each year; that the country's economy is shedding jobs at an alarming rate (116 000 jobs were lost in the first nine months of 1997); and that 53 per cent of South Africans currently live below the R301 per month poverty line." Contemplating The Impact Of Illegal Immigration On The Republic Of South Africa (http://www.queensu.ca/samp/sampresources/migrationdocuments/documents/2000/solomon.htm)

In the same report it was stated that "In March 1999, Senior Superintendent Johan Steyn, Commander of the Brixton Murder and Robbery Unit said that sixty per cent of all bank robberies and serious house burglaries in Hillbrow are perpetrated by illegal Zimbabwean immigrants."

As the number of blacks increases the crime increases, because this country's economy and food supply cannot sustain the population growth. The health services, social services, municipal services, water supply, electricity supply and the unmaintained infrastructure inherited from the National Party in 1994 cannot sustain the usage and demand.

If one considers the state that this country is in after only 18 years of uneducated black rule, imagine what it would be like in another 18 years from now, particularly with the continued influx of illegal immigrants, the theft of billions of Rand from the Government coffers every year, more and more corruption, murders, armed robberies, rapes, drugs, etc.

Besides the White Right dreaming of establishing a few different volkstaat / homelands in a number of different areas and taking back their Boer Republics, we read daily how the right-wing intends to fight, to start a war against the blacks, in the misguided belief that they would win.

The Great Congo War resulted in the second largest number of people ever killed in any war, second only to the number of people killed during WWII. Let us assume that the Right-Wing is really protected by some mystical force and that a civil war between blacks and whites also leads to the killing of 5,4 million people as during the the Great Congo War of 1998, it would still leave us with at least 45 million blacks (but probably closer to 100 million), and that is assuming that only blacks were to be killed in such war.

Unfortunately we do not have a population of only 51 million people, but rather closer to 100 million to 150 million people. In a war started by whites if only 500,000 were killed we'd be left with less than 4 million whites and 50% of the other whites would probably flee the country in the meantime, leaving us with perhaps 2,5 million whites, while the blacks would have been reduced by only a very tiny (negligible) percentage and the whites would be even more doomed than they are right now.

Even a war as horrendous as the great Congo War would change nothing, because the whites would still be the tiny minority it is today and blacks would still be the overwhelming majority.

Dreaming of things getting better for whites in future is a misguided dream and surely whites must be high on Crack to even be capable of such ridiculous dreams, let alone dreaming of starting and winning a war and taking over the country again. Wake up and be realistic for a change.

Things will not improve it will only get MUCH, MUCH WORSE. Transformation and BEE will be with us forever, because this is Africa. Opportunities for whites will DECREASE, not increase. Blacks will continue reproducing at an average of 6 to 8 children per woman and illegal immigrants will continue streaming in by their millions, drastically increasing their numbers over the next few decades, while whites will continue decreasing in numbers with the consequence that the ratio between blacks and whites will widen more and more.

Global economic collapse, collapse of the South African economy (which is long overdue anyway),  World War III, drastic Climate Change, huge reduction in agricultural production together with the continued black population growth in SA provides a recipe for massive increase in murders, crime, rape, drugs, violence, riots, revolution and everything else that goes with it.

Whites should stop talking nonsense about war, because they know NOTHING about war and even if there was a war between blacks and whites it would have a virtually zero impact on the number of blacks, while the whites would be wiped out and whites will not regain the power for as long as they remain the tiny minority they are.

We are living in a black African Country where we are a tiny minority, this is  not a white European country where whites are the majority. The whites in South Africa will eventually be devoured, with or without a fight, with or without help from abroad. This is Africa and a war will be the end of the white race in South Africa. So stop talking nonsense about taking them on and starting a civil war, because you have not done the maths.

Whites are free to dream of better days in South Africa and they are free to remain blind, deaf, stupid and ignorant, but time and the realities of the future will catch up to them, because basic maths will dictate the outcome. As parents we need to do what is best for our children, as children we need to consider what is best for our parents, and simple maths dictates that a war killing as many as 10 million blacks would not make much difference to their numbers, but a war would make a huge dent in our own numbers and our own chances of survival.

Unless something truly supernatural happens whites will NEVER have a future in South Africa EVER AGAIN! Things will NOT improve for whites in South Africa and it will only get WORSE, MUCH WORSE.

If you do not believe this, start doing the maths and start thinking realistically for a change.

http://toxinews.blogspot.com/2012/01/lesson-in-mathematics-south-african.html?m=1

White genocide in South Africa: the facts

by Kevin King

In response to an article on News24, White Genocide, fact or fiction?, I’d like to separate fact from fiction.

The definition of genocide

“The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.

Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide:

1. the mental element, meaning the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”, and
2. the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e.  A crime must include both elements to be called “genocide.”
   1. Killing members of the group;
   2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
      1. includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation.
   3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
   4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
   5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Protected Groups

A national group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by a common country of nationality or national origin.

An ethnical group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common cultural traditions, language or heritage.

A racial group means a set of individuals whose identity is defined by physical characteristics.

A religious group is a set of individuals whose identity is defined by common religious creeds, beliefs, doctrines, practices, or rituals.

Key Terms

The crime of genocide has two elements:   intent and action.  “Intentional” means purposeful.  Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders.  But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts.

Intent is different from motive.  Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorial integrity, etc.), if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide.

The phrase “in whole or in part” is important.  Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group.  Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide.  Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members – mass murder.  But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.”

Size does not matter

The author starts off by saying “If 70 000 whites were murdered by blacks since 1994, it could have indeed been close to a genocide”.  He then goes on to dispute this number, however size is irrelevant.

According to the definition of genocide, “an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group [or part of a group]”

Intention to commit genocide

The definition clearly states that there are two ways to prove intent:   “from statements or orders” or “inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts”.

The question of whether there is a presence of a systematic pattern of coordinated acts to commit genocide is highly debatable and difficult to prove.  Perpetrators of genocide are more likely to commit this crime covertly.  In a country like South Africa, the most violent country on earth, it is easy to hide the intent of committing genocide, xenophobia and homophobia under the cover of normal crime because of our high crime rates.  And if a genocidal plan was proven without a shadow of a doubt, the country would surely and immediately enter a stage of civil war and the economy would collapse, something which the perpetrators would strive to avoid.

On the other hand, proving intent from statement or orders is far less debatable.  High-ranking public officials making statements like “Kill the Boer”, “Shoot the Boer” or “One Bullet, One Farmer” can easily be interpreted as an order to commit genocide.  “Shoot the Boer” was found by the courts to be hate speech.  Hate speech incites violence.  According to the international definition of genocide:

“Article III:  The following acts shall be punishable:

1. Genocide;
2. Conspiracy to commit genocide;
3. Direct and public incitement to commit genocide;
4. Attempt to commit genocide;
5. Complicity in genocide. “

Firstly, put your objective hat on.  Now consider the following:  A public figure making a public statement to “Shoot the Boer” or “Kill the Boer” sounds very much like a direct and public incitement to commit genocide.  You don’t need to commit genocide to be guilty of genocide and punishable under the 1948 convention.  But, however factual my findings are or no matter how much sense it makes, I’m a million percent sure that I will get responses like:   “That song is a cultural thing”, “Nobody takes these people seriously”, “Those phrases are misunderstood.” etc.  Hypothetically, let’s say you are right and these statements were not deliberately made to incite genocide and there is no organised plan to commit genocide.   Let’s go back to the definition of genocide:

“an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group”

It only takes ONE individual to kill ONE person, if that individual knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the people.  That means that if only ONE individual interprets a statement like “Shoot the Boer” by his commander and chief for instance, to be an order to commit genocide and acts on it, that individual will be guilty of committing genocide, plain and simple.  Let’s look at a case study:

Case study – Helen and Alice Lotter

Free State farmers protesting against the gruesome ethnic murder on Helen and Alice Lotter

Mrs Helen Lotter, 57, and her bedridden mother Alice, 76.  Tortured to death with broken beer bottles in their anuses and vaginas – the attack had been so horrendous that the post-mortem examiner was unable to find any of Helen Lotter’s sexual organs at all; her breasts were partially cut off and broken bottle-shards were inserted in her vagina and anus as part of the hours of torture she and her mother Alice had endured –her cervix and uterus were completely shredded.  The mother’s front teeth were bashed out; her entire body was ‘covered in bruises, chafing and stabbing wounds. Her sexual parts were mutilated extensively also internally.  The old farm woman had died due to ‘asphyxiation after breathing in blood from penetrating stabbing wounds in her neck and throat’.  They were then both left to die.  Mrs Helen Lotter’s death-bed confession identified the killers as a gardener, Joseph Hlongwane, 22 who had only started working for them a few months earlier, and an associate Joseph Khumalo, 21.  The forensic DNA and fingerprint evidence confirmed Helen Lotter’s death-bed confession. “Kill the Boer” had been daubed in the women’s blood on the farmhouse walls.

ANC mayor, Mrs Mataba Leeto led an anti-Boer protest at the law court where the trial was held.  They chanted genocidal hate-speech songs such as ‘Kill the Boer, kill the Farmer’ in support of the two killers’ getting bail.  Mrs Leeto has not been put on public record as expressing any kind of sympathy nor outrage over the way the two Lotter women had been tortured to death.   Instead, she led a group which was protesting against the ‘racism’ of local Afrikaner residents who had held a ‘re-enactment’ of the way in which the women were tortured to death to illustrate the community’s deep anger. Both men were found guilty and sent to prison.

According to the definition of genocide, a crime can only be called genocide if both elements of Article II are present:

1. the mental element, meaning the “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such”, and
2. the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e.

Mental element

Intent to destroy can be proven directly from statements or orders.  In this case the statement “Kill the Boer” can be linked directly to the crime and can be interpreted as an order.

In whole or in part: perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group, an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group.  In this case two individuals killed two people, and by providing evidence for intention, “Kill the Boer”, their actions infer that in their minds, they were acting out on a larger plan to destroy a group.

A national, ethnical, racial or religious group:  In this case the perpetrators acted on the Afrikaner ethnic group specifically, as proven with their words “Kill the Boer”.

Physical element

In this case we had the killing members of the group.  On top of that, the crime included torture, rape, sexual violence and mutilation which are synonymous with genocide.

Conclusion

There are indicators that genocide could be happening on a larger scale, for example, widespread rape, torture and executions of Afrikaners on their farms, with perpetrators stealing few or no valuables.  However the existence of an organised plan to commit genocide is unknown and will be extremely difficult to prove.  Regardless, individuals can be perpetrators of genocide by definition.  In the above case study, the evidence provided is clear.  If you debate me on this case, at best you prove that this case is a racist hate crime, which I’m afraid is not much worse than genocide.  And before I’m accused of being right-winged, let me make myself clear – There are racists in every race on earth, racist hate crimes are committed by all races and genocide can be committed by any race upon another race, even if it’s done by individuals.

Understanding each other’s anger

As described in Stephen Covey ‘7 Habits’, “Seek first to understand, before seeking to be understood.”

We as human beings get angry when we are victims of crime, even more so when we are specifically targeted because of our race, sexuality, gender etc.  In South Africa we know this all too well.  We understand the great atrocities committed during Apartheid, the racial discrimination inflicted upon groups and the anger it produced.  Well the exact same anger is felt when individuals are targeted today, as seen in the case study, solely because of their race.  Understand why other members of the victim’s group would feel threatened, angry and perceive there to be a possible genocide occurring.  And when they speak out they are insulted.  Please, just a little understanding goes a long way in building this country.

http://praag.org/?p=6126

SO THE TRUTH WILL NOW GET YOU ARRESTED?

So after a radio discussion about Sunette Bridges  https://www.facebook.com/SunetteBridges?fref=ts and some things that have been said on her Facebook Page, we have been warned that if you call black people or the ANC “murderous bastards” you will be arrested!

Well I for one would like to know what I will be arrested for? For telling the truth? For reporting the facts? Well know this – the people or rather animals that are targeting white people and raping and torturing them are murderous scum!! And considering that they are black it is safe to assume that they are members of the ANC!! Do you think for one moment that threatening us with jail time will stop us from spreading the news about what is going on in South Africa? You will not silence us!! You can lock us up, torture us and let your hordes of savage criminals kill us. But know this you will never silence us!! Our spirit can not be broken by the likes of you!

Apparently you will be investigating all her facebook friends as well? Mwahahahahahahahaha – now that really is funny! Have you seen how many facebook friends we have? Your police force cant solve savage farm attacks but you are going to fill the prisons with facebook users? LoL! Go ahead and show the world how anti-white the law is and how inept the police department is. 

Killing whites wont get you locked up but speaking your mind on facebook will? Only in South Africa!! Why don’t you try and put an end to the racist murders of farmers and other white folks, hell, try and put an end to all murders, then maybe all these people crying foul on social networks will go away by themselves?

We all know you don’t have time for that, no you to busy trying to intimidate a bunch of people who want to live together without you outside Pretoria? Why do you think they built walls around themselves and don’t want to integrate? Because of all the murderous bastards out there that want to rape and kill them? Leave them be – they are not doing any harm what so ever! I don’t hear you complaining about the walls Mr.Zuma built around his “Nkandla” and I don’t see any white people being invited to live there, God knows there is enough space! It is a safety thing you say? To keep our president safe? So why does he get to be safe from the murderous bastards and the rest of us don’t? Instead of worrying about a bunch of white folks who want to live separate from a society that is drowning in violent crime, why not try something like solving our crime problems? So that people don’t have to feel that their only option is to remove themselves from our society.

Do us all a favor and stop worrying about our facebook pages and start putting an end to the free for all crime spree that has put an end to the so called rainbow nation…

http://nubbi.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/so-the-truth-will-now-get-you-arrested/

South African's Attacked.

KNOWN ATTACKS FOR MARCH 2012:

BENONI: Elderly couple in their seventiesfound murdered in Masefield Street.
ALBERTSDAL: Man shoots one armed attacker during house attack.
SABIE: Elderly couple brutally assaulted by armed intruders.
PUTFONTEIN: Hennie Greeff in critical condition after being shot in the head.
BRACKENDOWNS: Home owner shoots one armed attacker.
BOSHOFF: Woman raped during brutal farm attack by armed blacks.
GLEN MARAIS: Two armed black attackers killed in separate incidents during robbery on business.
COLESBERG: White policeman arrests car thief during bungled robbery.
SKEERPOORT: Alet and Paul Badenhorst, pensioners, attacked and assaulted by armed blacks.
BRITS: Elderly woman raped and murdered and Okkie Els brutally assaulted by four attackers.
KOMMISSIEDRIF: Elderly couple Ericcson brutally attacked on farm Magatthashoek, but son comes to the rescue.
WITBANK: Veronica Edwards (30) fights back bravely against racist attacker in her home who called her “white bitch”.
RUSTENBURG: Group of black mineworkers assault Anita Venter (24) and turns over her car.
KRUGERSDORP: CCTV cameras catch brutal attack on young white pedestrian by black policemen.
CENTURION: Lizette Langeveld (43) uses facebook and BKA to call for help during armed attack – civilians to the rescue.
MONTCLAIR: Young man shot dead on highway by black truck driver, sporting false number plates.
PRETORIA: General Richard Mdluli to face criminal charges after corruption in South Africa’s Crime Intelligence Unit.
HARRISMITH: Man dies in hospital after brutal attack with knives by black attackers.
SKEERPOORT: Owners of Suerseba Café brutally assaulted and tied up. Ribs fractured and serious facial injuries.
VRYBURG: Tjaart Chambers assaulted by four attackers.
EIKENHOF: Sheldon Human, heavyweight boxer, shot dead by four armed black attackers.
MIDDELBURG: Rouvhan Viljoen (30) stabbed six times with knife by taxi driver.
PRETORIA: Civil servants reportedly stole more than R300 million of public money during the 2011 financial year.
MIDDELBURG: Ems Reynecke (70) brutally assaulted in her home by three armed attackers.
POTCHEFSTROOM: Elderly woman (70’s) paralysed after brutal attack on farm.
EDENVALE: Gary Evans (39) shot dead and his wife wounded by three black attackers in Meadowdale.
FARRARMERE: Elderly couple brutally murdered in their house by armed black attackers.
VERGELEë: Pensioners Vic and Hannie Nel assaulted and tied up with electrical cables during farm attack.
RICHARDSBAAI: Woman locked up in police cells for a night after allegedly making a racist remark in Virgin Active club.
VRYBURG: Elderly couple overpowered on farm near Vergelegen, armed attackers rolls vehicle 2km from farmstead.
BLACKHEATH: Armed attackers pour alcohol on elderly couple Willem (77) and Salome (81) Botha, threaten to set them to fire, and brutally assault them for more than an hour.
KWAZULU-NATAL: Municipality awards R800 000 tender to 18-year old school learner to build road near Highflats.
SIMON’S TOWN: Navy admiral’s wife caught shoplifting during SA Navy Festival.
SUMMER BEACH: Elderly couple attacked by armed blacks.
VRYHEID: School’s rugby player stabbed with knife by black youngster before game.
PENNINGTON: Jeanette Moore fights back and escaped black attacker.
PRETORIA: Shocking statistic of 27 000 police officers failing their firearm proficiency tests.
CRAMOND: Couple attacked and burned with boiling water during farm attack.

Conneticut USA Reporting on Genocide

Connecticut USA radio-station report on Genocide targetting Afrikaners in South Africa: plans to hold protest meeting: http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-117072/TS-580396.mp3

The commentator said: "They are slaughtering, raping, mutilating and killing the Boer farmers in South Africa because they are whites. The black leaders of South Africa don't want them there, they want them dead. The youth le...ader of the ruling ANC Julius Malema is openly singing for their genocide with the hatespeech song. Why do people say there is 'claimed' to be a genocide, but these things are happening right now. Why isn't anybody saying anything about this? There was widespread publicity about the blacks attacking people about immigration/xenophobia issues. But why are they covering up the genocide against the Boers? "

 

https://www.facebook.com/groups/107091805994307/312798268756992/#!/pages/Censorbugbear-Reports/116752351671946

TO IGNORE THE FACTS DOES NOT CHANGE THE FACTS.

by Johan P. Prinsloo

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

There are certain facts about South Africa that tend to be ignored or denied. People do not like hearing the truth, because they prefer living in a dream world of make-believe, but its time to wake up.

An opposition party is a body that consists mainly of people with experience in political affairs, because they have seats in parliament and have experience as active role-players in National and Local Governance.

It is a fact that when the ANC were handed the reigns in 1994 they had ZERO experience and ZERO knowledge of Politics, Democracy or Governance at any level. They were no more than a militant terrorist tea-club put in power to run a FIRST-WORLD COUNTRY.

Nowhere, never in the history of the World had a revolutionary, militant, rebel, terrorist, communist organisation taken over a country and continued its success or turn it into a success. In every single case where terrorists / "freedom fighters" had taken control of a country, they destroyed it.

The New SA is a typical African country on its way to revolution, bankruptcy, anarchy and total collapse.

The infrastructure is destroyed, because it has not been maintained since 1994. Our Railway services are destroyed, because the most overpaid person on Earth, Maria Ramos, sold all the assets to make the books look good, but by the time she left there was nothing left to sell, little income and the SA Railway services was destroyed, leaving us without even that rail infrastructure.

The Energy / Electricity supply is failing, because it has not been maintained or upgraded to keep up with the outrageous growing demand since 1994. Two weeks ago ESKOM the main (only) supplier of energy in the country publicly admitted that they had lost the battle and cannot meet the energy demands of the country. Another example of incompetent uneducated inexperienced fools taking over a well-oiled first world machine and driving it into the ground, besides having robbed it bankrupt.

Health Services is failing, because it has not been maintained since 1994 and from the outset it was given to incompetent uneducated fools to manage.

The whites who possess the knowledge and experience and work ethic to do the work, because they had been doing it for 400 years were removed from their positions and replaced with uneducated, ignorant, inexperienced, fools who do not possess the loyalty, the dedication or the work ethic to do the work.

Less than 6 million people carry the total tax burden of a population officially quoted as 50 million, but unofficially estimated at anything ranging from 70 million to as high as 150 million.

Less than 5% of all residents in all Municipal districts pay for services.

10% of the population is carrying the other 90%, while those in power are squandering 90% of the money taken from that 10%.

The New SA is an upside down pyramid that has to fall over. It cannot remain standing. It HAS to fall.

Educational standards were deliberately dropped and an educational system that built this country and delivered world-class professionals in all fields and at all levels was exchanged for a pathetic picture based based so-called Outcomes Based Educational system. Without proper educational standards from the first grade to the highest post-graduate level, a country is rendered infertile and barren with no future.

Our dams have never been maintained, the motors needed to open the sluices at some of the major dams have been stolen, the foundations of some of the dams damaged beyond repair, the dam walls are nearing the end of their lifespan with no back-up to replace it with. It is suicide living below any dam in the New SA.

There is not a government department that is not either bankrupt or virtually bankrupt. This regime is bankrupt, this country is virtually bankrupt, mostly due to mismanagement by ignorant uneducated inexperienced fools and their theft, fraud and corruption.

The banks are bankrupt and the inflation rate is a pathetic joke, because everyone with even the least bit of sense realises that our inflation rate is at least 10 times what government says it is.

All Government and semi-state institutions are in complete and utter chaos, inefficient, ineffective and incapable of coping with or doing their work.

Notwithstanding the fact that the regime is discriminating against the white minority with transformation policies that PROHIBIT whites from entering the job market and whites are being laid off to make room for uneducated, unqualified, inexperienced blacks.

By 2014 blacks must be the majority shareholders of all companies, whether founded and built by whites or not and even family businesses.

It is a fact that whites are being dispossessed and disowned. Whites are being denied their "Constitutional rights" and their citisenship is being limited. The regime is trying to making life impossible for whites.

Notwithstanding the above, blacks are still unsatisfied with whites being in any position or being allowed in any kind of business. This dissatisfaction is a driving force behind the revolution. Even members of the ruling party frequently make public statements openly expressing their hatred of whites. Members of parliament have on occasion told whites to leave the country if they are unhappy, obviously because we are not wanted.

There are many, many examples of revolutionary videos, articles, movements and calls for the public to rise up against the Regime. This is being done so openly that articles are published in newspapers, black revolutionaries are stirring the pot on their Facebook walls on blogs and in YouTube videos. Numerous journalists and political analysts have warned about the revolution headed our way. This is Africa, therefore the standard symptoms and signs of revolution do not apply. Here it will not be the middle class rising up against the state, but the poor ignorant masses being abused by self-serving militant communists.

The regime is undoubtedly aware that the revolution will not come from the disarmed white minority population and that it is being driven by the black populous, spearheaded by middle-class and super rich blacks. Notwithstanding this knowledge the regime is not lifting a finger to gain the support of the white minority and allowing the white population to be victimised, murdered, harassed and terrorised by militant terrorist blacks.

Many official internationally accepted aspects of genocide are openly being perpetrated against the white minority, yet not a single opposition party, let alone the regime itself, says anything about it. Genocide Watch upgraded the New SA to level 6 Genocide, out of a possible 8 levels. Not a single newspaper, radio station or television network has said a word about it, but perhaps for Radio Pretoria to a limited extent due of legal restrictions. Something strange is happening. Even the leaders of the numerous volkstaat movements are denying the looming revolution.

At the same time the Broers are occupying the minds of a sector of the white population with an ideal of an elitist super Afrikaner-Broer volkstaat, while also being deliberately blind about the coming revolution. The people leading the volkstaat ideology openly object to anyone, like myself, warning people and informing people about the coming revolution and one has to question WHY? If you scroll down my wall you will see those arguments thrown at me, because they the volkstaat Broers do not want people to know whats coming. It obviously does not suite their exclusive elitist self-preservation ideologies.

One has to question why the media, the liberals, the opposition parties and the volkstaters are ignoring the looming signs of revolution and collapse. One has to question why people want to promise the Afrikaner-Broers a promised land of freedom and self-governance, while denying any signs of a civil war? One has to question why the world is being told of a genocide against the Afrikaners and Boers, while ignoring the other non-Afrikaner whites being murdered, while at the same time denying a looming civil war and economic collapse?

With reference to the volkstaat lets consider a few facts being deliberately ignored.

It is a fact that the Boer Republics officially ceased to exist on 31 May 1902, with the signing of the Treaty of Vereeniging. A new British colony, the Union of South Africa, was subsequently established, in which the Transvaal and the Orange Free State became provinces along with the Cape and Natal. The Boer republics AGREED to come under the sovereignty of the British Crown. It is a fact that the Boer Republics were lost because the Boers themselves laid down their arms and gave it to Britain by having signed it away. That is a fact, like or or not. The BOERS signed away the Boer Republics and no one can ever go back on that. Signatories for the Government of the South African Republic, Schalk W. Burger, F.W. Reitz, Louis Botha, J. H. de la Rey, L.J. Meyer, and J.C. Krogh. For the Government of the Orange Free State, C.R. de Wet, J.B.M. Hertzog, C.H. Olivier and WCJ Bebner.

With the advent of the Republic of South Africa on 31 May 1961 the boarders of the Republic were laid down and recognised world-wide. This time the British signed away the entire United territory of South Africa by which a new Internationally recognised Independent Republic was established. It is a fact that the Boer Republics are gone forever, because the BOERS THEMSELVES signed it away willingly, so live with it.

This is Africa. While we may ignore the fact, nothing in Africa works the way it does anywhere else in the World. Africa has its own rules, they make their own new rules as they go along, and always to suite them and their needs and wants.

To change any Act takes no less than five years, lately anything between five and ten years. For a Volkstaat to be established numerous pieces of Legislation would need to be amended and drafted, which would not be possible within the next 15 to 25 years. The volkstaat would also require serious considerations in terms of the Constitution, which would certainly extend that period.

Before the volkstaat could be negotiated they would need to define exactly where this volkstaat would be, which is a major obstacle, because even to this day the promoters of the volkstaat are still arguing and asking where perhaps it could be.

They would need to set the criteria for qualification as a citisen of the volkstaat, which thus far excluded anyone not of the so-called ethnic genetic pool, strictly Afrikaans speaking, strictly Christian (probably only those belonging to the three mainstream Afrikaans Broederbond churches), etc. They have not even given any consideration to those qualifying members of the super-race living in old-age homes, retirements villages, land owners that would need to try and get their land sold and restart everything from scratch in the Shangri-La, because quite frankly they could not be bothered with those people, as long as they themselves could flee to their holy land and be safe, because that is all that matters to them.

Now consider the following. Since 1994 the SA farmers have been demanding that their land be bought for the purpose of redistribution to blacks, but they the white Afrikaner-Broers are expecting to just be given this massive area of land without having to pay for it at current market prices, right? In Africa, right? Yeah right.

Before the Broers could get their volkstaat, they would need to negotiate that the large yet-to-be-identified section of the independent sovereign Republic of South Africa be given away (or sold to them). This would require that COSATU, the DA, the SACP, the ANC, the ANCYL, AZAPO, and every other political grouping in the country agrees to it. At the very least a special Referendum would need to be called and the majority of the country would need to agree to this. Without the approval/agreement of the majority of the owners of the country, which means the citisens of this country, this will never happen. Now the whites are 3 million, of which only about 30,000 could possibly qualify according to these special ethnic genetic language and christian criteria, while at least 20 million people are on the voters' roll? Perhaps I just cannot do maths. We could ignore these facts, but unfortunately it remains facts they choose to ignore or keep quiet about. Only once that is done would the rest of the World consider recognising this new Broer Shangri-La.

"Nothing is impossible, but some things are just highly unlikely" - my late eldest brother Pieter Willem Prinsloo

Also remember this, the very Afrikaners opposed the Referendum calling for us to break away from Britain and become a Republic in 1961 and the referendum was almost lost, but for a tiny number of votes.

Then the next referendum was to decide about allowing blacks into government with everything that went with it. Well as I recall it was won quite comfortably with the help of huge Afrikaner support.

Then in 1995 Nelson Mandela pulled a Rugby jersey over his shoulders and the Afrikaners cheered him and thought heaven had descended upon this great land. In FACT he stole their hearts and bought their souls in the name of their one TRUE god, Rugby.

Then just a few months ago the DA won their hearts, their support and their votes, while they shunned their own Afrikaner parties? Those that chose not to vote gave their tacit support to the ruling party, the ANC, while they could have supported one of their own Afrikaner parties, like the Freedom Front, which was the only viable option and which I chose to support myself. Those who voted for the DA supported the same land reform policies as that of the ANC? They also supported the ex-leader of the BLACK SASH, Helen Zille. They always have some sneering remarks about the Jews, but yet they chose to support a Jew above their own? Yet now they want a volkstaat without Jews, without English, Portuguese, Greeks, Germans, etc?

It is a fact that Africans are wanting to claim Africa for Africans only. They want to get rid of ALL whites on this continent and they succeeded in every other country in Africa.

It is a fact that the SA whites are under threat, not just the Afrikaans speaking or the so-called Boers. This is a fact we could choose to ignore, but it certainly does not change the fact.

It is a fact that in 1994 the Republic of SA was given away by Afrikaners. It is a fact that those Afrikaners qualify for Boer Status, whether we like to admit it or not. Just like the Boers signed away the Boer Republics the Boers signed away the old Republic of SA.

https://www.facebook.com/notes/johan-p-prinsloo/to-ignore-the-facts-does-not-change-the-facts/10150816844845034

South African Genocide Stage 6