A South African artist called Brett Murray has been causing a huge stir since his painting of South Africa’s president titled The Spear was put up in a local gallery. The ANC have worked themselves up into a total frothy about the painting and their biggest issue with it - It’s racist. ???????
Disrespectful, maybe. Rude, maybe. But racist???
That little word that has become the political whip with which the ANC work the masses up into angry mobs and riots anytime something happens that they don’t like. And it’s becoming really really tiring.
In South Africa, the word racist has lost it’s original meaning and now only get’s used to describe a white person doing something a black person doesn’t like. You never hear it used in any other context. You can’t say to a black CEO that he is racist because he won’t hire white people, no - he’s just making sure that only blacks get hired because of BEE. You can’t call a university racist because they won’t accept an application from a white student with straight A’s for 8 subjects - instead taking on a black student who barely passed matric. Nope, they’re not racist, they’re just correcting the wrongs of the past. But god forbid you do hire the white person or you do admit the white student, you’ll be branded racist by the government quicker that you can say “colour shouldn’t be the issue here” because how dare you choose a white person over a black person in a democratic South Africa.
Most of the time when you are a white person and you call your fellow countrymen to be held accountable for their unacceptable words and actions such as corruption, nepotism, fraud, theft, you’ll be branded a racist.
Today, I shouted at a taxi driver who pushed in-front of me nearly driving me into the curb with no regard for the fact that I have a child in the car - I must be a racist, because only racists care about road safety it would seem.
I complained to the manager of my bank because the woman handling my account is so incompetent and hasn’t responded to one email or message I’ve left her for over 2 months! Nevermind that my account is about to be shut down because of FICA. I must be a racist then because only racists expect service from a bank and stupidly think an organisation is going to actually do the job they promise to do in all their marketing material.
The other day my husband confronted a woman outside a shopping centre after she carelessly threw her fast food packet on the floor less than 10cm from a dustbin. Her response - "you’re just a racist". Yes, you’re absolutely right, because only racists care about keeping their city clean and litter free.
I fired a lady who worked for me once because I caught her rummaging through one of my cupboards and she had taken my passport and other belongings which I found in her bag. Her only response - "you’re a racist". Yes, yes I am. Because only racists think that stealing is a criminal offense and is done by people with no morals or conscience.
I swear being a white person in this country can be very bloody exasperating at times. The ANC has brainwashed the masses with this little word - racist - to the point that it’s actually completely lost its meaning and now get’s used totally out of context. Most days I just let it pass and I don’t go into effect of it. But today is not one of those days. Today I’m angry and today I’m sick and tired of it.
I’m not shouting at you because you’re black, I’m shouting because you’re a maniac on the roads who is a danger to society.
I’m not complaining to your manager because you’re black. I’m complaining because you’re an incompetent moron who is incapable of doing her job properly.
I’m not firing you because you’re black. I’m firing you because you’re a thief.
I’m not confronting you because your black, I’m shouting at you because you’re a messy pig who expects other people to clean up your mess.
Please get over yourselves and move out the way of the remarkably amazing black people who DO take total responsibility and who actually want this country to work for ALL the people who live in it.
If being a racist in this country means that I will stand up for my rights, fight for what is fair and true and hold everyone around me accountable for their words and actions, then I am a racist through and through. If being a racist means that I believe in freedom of speech and expression and that everyone’s point of view is relevant, no matter what colour, age or sex, then I will proudly announce to all who can hear that I am a racist. If being a racist means that I believe we should all be treated with the same rules and consequences and that no-one, especially not the President, is above the law and exempt from criminal prosecution when that law has been broken, then print me a t-shirt saying “I am a racist” and I will wear it in the streets. If being a racist means that I will not stand idly by while the few, corrupt pigs in the ANC rape this country for everything they can get with no regard for the poor and the homeless and the uneducated, then I’ll get I’m a racist tattooed on my back.
Mr Zuma and the ANC - you need to get a different vocabulary. Instead of shouting at someone like Brett Murray about a painting being offensive, maybe you should be asking yourselves why he painted it in the first place. Instead of wanting to take Zapiro to court every time he depicts the president & his shower head in one of his cartoons, why don’t you stop to realise that there is truth in everything he draws and that your angry responses are really due to the fact that he keeps hitting a nerve that’s a little too close to home.
Maybe, Mr Zuma, it’s time to take a long, hard look in the mirror. If you were honest with yourself you’d see that people actually have very little respect for you because some believe you have lied and cheated your way through your Presidency. According to reports you have been involved with more seedy, corrupt criminals than Horatio Cane and that you have abused funds for personal gain. Even the great Oliver Tambo’s daughter doesn’t think much of you based on what she had to say about the painiting: “He should inspire the reverence he craves. This portrait is what he inspired”
You Mr Zuma and your ANC are a bunch of CANTS!
CAN’T let go of the past
CAN’T stop operating from a place of revenge and hate for what’s happened in the past
CAN’T stop the out of control corruption that is rife throughout every government department
CAN’T seem to get the education right in this country
CAN’T say goodbye of Affirmative Action and BEE which is ruining businesses across this land
But what do I know?
I’m just a white girl talking about a black man.
I must be a racist
http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/I-am-a-racist-20120522
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Our Gangster State
Justice Malala - 30 April, 2012
Now that the ANC has managed to get rid of Julius Malema, its troublesome youth league president, and his rude sidekick Floyd Shivambu, the party might want to concentrate on something meatier. It might want to ask its president, Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma, what kind of rotten state he is running in its name.
The ANC sent Zuma to the Union Buildings. In its name, he governs South Africa. He should be accountable to it if he is not accountable to the rest of us, the citizenry.
He should now account to the ANC about why Richard Mdluli, the head of crime intelligence in the SA Police Service, is back at his desk and not in a court of law or behind bars for corruption.
Nothing smacks of corruption in this country as much as the figure of Mdluli, a man who is being mentioned as a possible national police commissioner. Nothing scares me more than the possibility that such a compromised figure stands to assume so much power.
This much we know is true, thanks to the incredibly brave work of journalists at the Mail & Guardian, the Sunday Times and the City Press newspapers. It is worth noting that these journalists would be in jail today if the Protection of Information Act were in operation.
Here is the first thing: within a year of his appointment to the crime intelligence job in 2009, Mdluli appointed seven of his relatives as secret agents. There is no dispute about this. As you read this, seven members of this man's family are drawing salaries from the national cash pile - money that could be used for the poor, the hungry, those who will die of the cold this winter because they have nowhere to sleep.
Instead, as City Press reported last weekend, it is costing the crime intelligence unit R5-million to employ Mdluli's relatives and supply them with luxury cars.
This is not corruption. This is looting. This is the mentality of people who believe they are invincible, that they are protected from on high. If Zuma is not protecting Mdluli, he should suspend and fire the man immediately for just this one piece of absolute corruption.
But there is more to this rot and the depth of it chills me to the bone. Mdluli was not interviewed by police management for the job he holds. He was instead interviewed by four politicians: Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa, State Security Minister Siyabonga Cwele, the then home affairs deputy minister Malusi Gigaba, who is now minister of public enterprises, and former safety and security deputy minister Susan Shabangu, who is now minister of mineral resources.
Mthethwa is a fierce Zuma defender and is actively campaigning for him to be re-elected as ANC president in Mangaung in December. So is Gigaba, who has acted as the main Zuma defender against attacks by Malema's ANC Youth League. You may also be interested to know that Mthethwa appears on one of the lists drawn up by the Zuma crowd to be in the ANC's top six after Mangaung.
Cwele is the man who has been firing intelligence services heads allegedly because they refused to be used to spy for Zuma. In March Moe Shaik left the State Security Agency. SSA director-general Jeff Maqetuka left in December and the head of the domestic branch, Gibson Njenje, left in September. Cwele is now master and commander of Zuma's spy network.
Mdluli's appointment was not just irregular. It was conspiratorial and it is a crime. These ministers should account for why they were on that panel in the first place and why the then acting national police commissioner, Tim Williams, and other police officials were not on the interviewing panel.
Why were four ministers interviewing a policeman? Were they instructed to hire him and dress up the whole thing?
Will they explain? Of course not. How can Mthethwa explain when, according to City Press, the Hawks were investigating claims that almost R200000 was paid from the crime intelligence slush fund for renovations to his house in KwaZulu-Natal? He is implicated in the crimes. He is compromised.
Mdluli was up on charges of murder, kidnapping, assault and intimidation. There were also charges of massive fraud involving the crime intelligence slush fund. The Mail & Guardian has revealed that those charges were dropped despite a letter from the inspector-general of intelligence, Faith Radebe, in March, in which she said that the National Prosecuting Authority should institute criminal charges against Mdluli: "We are of the opinion that the reasons advanced by the NPA in support of the withdrawal of the criminal charges are inaccurate and legally flawed. We therefore recommend that this matter be referred back to the NPA for the institution of the criminal charges."
That has not happened. Instead, Mdluli is in office and is already re-organising the crime intelligence unit so that it has oversight of all security arrangements for all ministers and dignitaries. What does this mean? Each and every one of Zuma's detractors will be under 24-hour surveillance by this compromised spy boss.
Where are the voices of Gwede Mantashe, Kgalema Motlanthe, Cyril Ramaphosa, Trevor Manuel and others when this rot is being perpetrated in their name? Where is the ANC of OR Tambo?
It is silent, quivering in fear of its own "deployee", Jacob Zuma, a man who is running what is now clearly a gangster state.
http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2012/04/30/our-gangster-state
Now that the ANC has managed to get rid of Julius Malema, its troublesome youth league president, and his rude sidekick Floyd Shivambu, the party might want to concentrate on something meatier. It might want to ask its president, Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma, what kind of rotten state he is running in its name.
The ANC sent Zuma to the Union Buildings. In its name, he governs South Africa. He should be accountable to it if he is not accountable to the rest of us, the citizenry.
He should now account to the ANC about why Richard Mdluli, the head of crime intelligence in the SA Police Service, is back at his desk and not in a court of law or behind bars for corruption.
Nothing smacks of corruption in this country as much as the figure of Mdluli, a man who is being mentioned as a possible national police commissioner. Nothing scares me more than the possibility that such a compromised figure stands to assume so much power.
This much we know is true, thanks to the incredibly brave work of journalists at the Mail & Guardian, the Sunday Times and the City Press newspapers. It is worth noting that these journalists would be in jail today if the Protection of Information Act were in operation.
Here is the first thing: within a year of his appointment to the crime intelligence job in 2009, Mdluli appointed seven of his relatives as secret agents. There is no dispute about this. As you read this, seven members of this man's family are drawing salaries from the national cash pile - money that could be used for the poor, the hungry, those who will die of the cold this winter because they have nowhere to sleep.
Instead, as City Press reported last weekend, it is costing the crime intelligence unit R5-million to employ Mdluli's relatives and supply them with luxury cars.
This is not corruption. This is looting. This is the mentality of people who believe they are invincible, that they are protected from on high. If Zuma is not protecting Mdluli, he should suspend and fire the man immediately for just this one piece of absolute corruption.
But there is more to this rot and the depth of it chills me to the bone. Mdluli was not interviewed by police management for the job he holds. He was instead interviewed by four politicians: Police Minister Nathi Mthethwa, State Security Minister Siyabonga Cwele, the then home affairs deputy minister Malusi Gigaba, who is now minister of public enterprises, and former safety and security deputy minister Susan Shabangu, who is now minister of mineral resources.
Mthethwa is a fierce Zuma defender and is actively campaigning for him to be re-elected as ANC president in Mangaung in December. So is Gigaba, who has acted as the main Zuma defender against attacks by Malema's ANC Youth League. You may also be interested to know that Mthethwa appears on one of the lists drawn up by the Zuma crowd to be in the ANC's top six after Mangaung.
Cwele is the man who has been firing intelligence services heads allegedly because they refused to be used to spy for Zuma. In March Moe Shaik left the State Security Agency. SSA director-general Jeff Maqetuka left in December and the head of the domestic branch, Gibson Njenje, left in September. Cwele is now master and commander of Zuma's spy network.
Mdluli's appointment was not just irregular. It was conspiratorial and it is a crime. These ministers should account for why they were on that panel in the first place and why the then acting national police commissioner, Tim Williams, and other police officials were not on the interviewing panel.
Why were four ministers interviewing a policeman? Were they instructed to hire him and dress up the whole thing?
Will they explain? Of course not. How can Mthethwa explain when, according to City Press, the Hawks were investigating claims that almost R200000 was paid from the crime intelligence slush fund for renovations to his house in KwaZulu-Natal? He is implicated in the crimes. He is compromised.
Mdluli was up on charges of murder, kidnapping, assault and intimidation. There were also charges of massive fraud involving the crime intelligence slush fund. The Mail & Guardian has revealed that those charges were dropped despite a letter from the inspector-general of intelligence, Faith Radebe, in March, in which she said that the National Prosecuting Authority should institute criminal charges against Mdluli: "We are of the opinion that the reasons advanced by the NPA in support of the withdrawal of the criminal charges are inaccurate and legally flawed. We therefore recommend that this matter be referred back to the NPA for the institution of the criminal charges."
That has not happened. Instead, Mdluli is in office and is already re-organising the crime intelligence unit so that it has oversight of all security arrangements for all ministers and dignitaries. What does this mean? Each and every one of Zuma's detractors will be under 24-hour surveillance by this compromised spy boss.
Where are the voices of Gwede Mantashe, Kgalema Motlanthe, Cyril Ramaphosa, Trevor Manuel and others when this rot is being perpetrated in their name? Where is the ANC of OR Tambo?
It is silent, quivering in fear of its own "deployee", Jacob Zuma, a man who is running what is now clearly a gangster state.
http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2012/04/30/our-gangster-state
Sunday, May 13, 2012
The ANC's Stuggle
Struggler's Struggle. Struggling to run a country.
Struggling to deal with crime.
Struggling to deliver services.
Struggling to deliver health care.
Struggling to unify South Africans.
Indeed. A party made of struggling.
Another 100 years of more struggling?
Struggling to deal with crime.
Struggling to deliver services.
Struggling to deliver health care.
Struggling to unify South Africans.
Indeed. A party made of struggling.
Another 100 years of more struggling?
Constitutional double standards in SA
By Mike Smith
10th of May 2012
Hot on the heels of the racist models Jessie and Tsidi who had breakfast with the DA where they kissed and made up came the village idiot one Itumeleng Mabeba who expressed his darkest fantasies in a tweet…Jessica Leandra dos Santos "deserved to burn in hell you racist cunt", and hoped she was "raped with a broken beer bottle", Jessie Leandra should be raped with a broken beer bottle
And mean time in Cape Town a student was expelled from CPUT for making a “rêssis” post on FaceBook in which he said black people were "fucking brain dead monkeys [who] always skinner [gossip] in their retarded language".Cape student suspended
And if you thought that was not enough already from the sensationalist media, then along came a black girl by the name of Rego Modise (17) who cried “Rêssism” when she was not allowed to partake in an Afrikaner only hockey trial.Black girl turned away from hockey trials
Typically she went to the gossip, sensationalist media and lied. Saying that she was sent to the trials by her coach and that upon registry she was told that the trials were for “white kids only”.
Her school principal said that neither he nor his staff sent any children to the Afrikaner only trials. The girl persuaded her parents to drive her there out of her own accord after the children heard about the trials through the grapevine.
Rev Peter Stans, CEO of Afrikaner Volkseie Sport, the organisers of Bokkie Week, said Modise had "definitely" not been invited for the trials, which were by invitation only. He said the week was for "Afrikaner" children only.School did not send students to hockey trials
So it was a total non-event that should never even have made it into the media, but no…The media could not resist flogging the dead racist horse back into life.
Section 18 of the Bill of Rights clearly states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of association”.
So what is “Racist” about Afrikaners holding a hockey tournament for Afrikaners only? Excluded were English whites too.
One commentator posted a list of “Blacks-only” organizations in SA which nobody seems to have a problem with…
BLACK Lawyers Association (BLA)
BLACK Accountants Association (ABASA)
BLACK Journalists Association
BLACK Management Forum (BMF)
BLACK Securities and Investment Professionals Association (ABSIP)
BLACK Construction Association (BBCBE)
BLACK Business Association (NAFCOC)
BLACK Business Executive Circle (BBEC)
BLACK Association of Travel Agents (BATASA)
BLACK Brokers Association (BBCSA)
BLACK Businesswomens Association (BBWA)
AFRICAN Women Chartered Accountants (AWCA)
…But just let the Afrikaners hold their own sports event, then they are “rêssis”. Seems like the constitution is only valid for other South Africans, not for Afrikaners. They are not allowed to practice their freedoms as it stands in the constitution.
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2012/05/constitutional-double-standards-in-sa.html
10th of May 2012
Hot on the heels of the racist models Jessie and Tsidi who had breakfast with the DA where they kissed and made up came the village idiot one Itumeleng Mabeba who expressed his darkest fantasies in a tweet…Jessica Leandra dos Santos "deserved to burn in hell you racist cunt", and hoped she was "raped with a broken beer bottle", Jessie Leandra should be raped with a broken beer bottle
And mean time in Cape Town a student was expelled from CPUT for making a “rêssis” post on FaceBook in which he said black people were "fucking brain dead monkeys [who] always skinner [gossip] in their retarded language".Cape student suspended
And if you thought that was not enough already from the sensationalist media, then along came a black girl by the name of Rego Modise (17) who cried “Rêssism” when she was not allowed to partake in an Afrikaner only hockey trial.Black girl turned away from hockey trials
Typically she went to the gossip, sensationalist media and lied. Saying that she was sent to the trials by her coach and that upon registry she was told that the trials were for “white kids only”.
Her school principal said that neither he nor his staff sent any children to the Afrikaner only trials. The girl persuaded her parents to drive her there out of her own accord after the children heard about the trials through the grapevine.
Rev Peter Stans, CEO of Afrikaner Volkseie Sport, the organisers of Bokkie Week, said Modise had "definitely" not been invited for the trials, which were by invitation only. He said the week was for "Afrikaner" children only.School did not send students to hockey trials
So it was a total non-event that should never even have made it into the media, but no…The media could not resist flogging the dead racist horse back into life.
Section 18 of the Bill of Rights clearly states that “Everyone has the right to freedom of association”.
So what is “Racist” about Afrikaners holding a hockey tournament for Afrikaners only? Excluded were English whites too.
One commentator posted a list of “Blacks-only” organizations in SA which nobody seems to have a problem with…
BLACK Lawyers Association (BLA)
BLACK Accountants Association (ABASA)
BLACK Journalists Association
BLACK Management Forum (BMF)
BLACK Securities and Investment Professionals Association (ABSIP)
BLACK Construction Association (BBCBE)
BLACK Business Association (NAFCOC)
BLACK Business Executive Circle (BBEC)
BLACK Association of Travel Agents (BATASA)
BLACK Brokers Association (BBCSA)
BLACK Businesswomens Association (BBWA)
AFRICAN Women Chartered Accountants (AWCA)
…But just let the Afrikaners hold their own sports event, then they are “rêssis”. Seems like the constitution is only valid for other South Africans, not for Afrikaners. They are not allowed to practice their freedoms as it stands in the constitution.
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2012/05/constitutional-double-standards-in-sa.html
What went wrong with the New South Africa under the ANC Regime?
What could possibly have gone wrong that, under these saints, SA deteriorated
into the "Rape Capitol of the world", the "Drug Capitol of the world", the
"Human Trafficking Capitol of the world", the "Most Murderous Society in the
world."
Why did the ANC not live up to the expectations of the liberal world, the liberal media, liberal politicians and liberal churches?
The world wanted the ANC to rule South Africa, at all cost. The world media criminalised the National Party Government and did everything in their power to paint the darkest most sinister and misleading image of the pre-1994 Republic of South Africa.
At the same time the media created the impression that the ANC consisted of angels directly descended from heaven.
It did not end here, as they continued this process by presenting to the world a misleading impression of this New South Africa, FW de Klerk's "rainbow nation".
According to what the media has been spreading to the rest of the world, SA is a wonderful new democracy made in (their) heaven.
Pre-1994, according to world leaders, the churches, economists and the media, the ANC was consisting of upright, upstanding, righteous, honourable angels that could only be the ultimate, most perfect and most ideal group to take over as the future Government of South Africa.
So according to the media, churches and liberals, since 1994 we have been ruled by saints.
In the New South Africa ruled by the saints of the ANC, a woman, toddler or baby is raped every 17 seconds; between 50 and 100 people are murdered every day; armed robberies are at the order of the day; farm attacks are so serious that SA Farmers are recognised as having the most dangerous jobs on earth. Today no one is safe anywhere any time in South Africa.
Our first and worst mistake is having liberals running our media, churches and opposition politics, because liberals always have and always will deny everything. Liberals are the most evil and immoral people in the world. They are gutless, spineless appeasing weasels that do not have the guts to admit their mistakes, which means that no wrongs are never addressed. Because these immoral liberal weasels are denying the atrocities in this country nothing is being done about it. They, the liberals, supported and promoted terrorists, which means that they themselves must be terrorist, not so? They have been denying the rapes and murders in this country, which means they have been causing it to worsen, indirectly supporting the raping of our women and children.
Not a single liberal, not a single church in South Africa, nor the SA media have said a word about the murders, rapes or genocide in SA. All of them have been denying it all along, trying to hide the truth from South Africans and the world to protect their beloved ANC, to promote investment in SA and promote foreign tourism. To liberals Money is always more important than lives.
Where did the saints and angels of the ANC go wrong?
Well unfortunately the ANC did not go wrong, the ANC has been what they have always been, done what they have always been doing, just being themselves.
People have very short memories and forget that, until 1994, the ANC was an internationally listed terrorist organisation. Just days before the 1994 general elections the ANC was forced to register as a Political party... against their will. The ANC refused to register as a political party and was forced to do so in order to take part in the 1994 elections. They did not want to register and only did so at the very last moment, under duress.
The ANC thought, or rather expected, to just be handed the reigns and did not even want to go through an election process to be handed those reigns. Unfortunately for them they were eventually forced to do so.
Off course the 1994 elections were declared free and fair, while we all know it was not the case. More than a million voting ballots disappeared in Pretoria alone. Hundreds of thousands of ballots of the IFP just vanished. The 1994 elections were rigged, period.
But let us for now assume that 1994 election was free and fair and that the ANC did win the election fair and square and rather consider what went wrong.
Party politics is not a patriotic political system, because party politics demand loyalty to the party, loyalty to party policies and not loyalty to the country, or loyalty to the people and their needs. Elections are nothing other than popularity contests, where he who makes the most promises and markets himself best wins, to then appoint from his ranks the most popular among them all in important positions they are unqualified for and unable to manage. Mr. Popular himself becomes the President who leads the cutest of the party puppets.
Throughout SA's history it was party policy and rigid adherence to party policy that drove us in wrong directions and caused ruling parties to continue doing the wrong thing.
The ANC has never changed.
The ANC always was a terrorist organisation. The mere fact that immoral liberals chose to call them freedom fighters and that they were forced to register as a political party, did not change the ANC, they always were and always will remain just another rebel revolutionary terrorist movement. The ANC is only a political party by virtue of the fact that it was forced to register as such. To this very day the ANC still operates in exactly the same way as they have been doing for the past one hundred years. Nothing has changed.
The poor ignorant liberal world expected the ANC to change overnight from a terrorist movement to a patriotic political party made up of honourable, upstanding, trustworthy citizens, but as expected that did not happen.
Ask any liberal if they would expect the same from the PAC today and they would not. Yet in the case of the ANC they did?
What would have happened had Al Capone and his gang taken over as rulers of the United States? Would they suddenly have changed overnight into upstanding, honourable citizens? Of course they would not have, but the world expected the ANC do so.
Would any other country in the world have allowed a group of terrorists, recently returned exiles that were spread across the world for decades, together with recently-discharged prisoners found guilty of high-treason, to take over their country? No country in the world would stand for that, yet South Africa was forced to do so.
Under normal circumstances political parties are formed and then get taken up in Government by way of elections... if they make it that far. Being part of the process, opposition parties learn the ropes and learn how Government functions, how State Departments are run and managed, decision-making processes and how the country is run. Should they be successful enough an opposition party may eventually even win an election and become the ruling party. By the time this happens the party would have gathered years of experience in Parliament and continue governing the country, without making huge sudden changes.
Did the ANC have ANY experience of Government? Did the ANC before 1994 ever serve in ANY Government, in any capacity whatsoever? No they did not. Yet the ignorant, immoral liberal world expected the ANC to just walk in and take over a first-world country and to, not only run it effectively, but to even grow and develop the country. Only an ignorant fool like a liberal could dream such ridiculous dreams.
Did the ANC in its entire one hundred years of existence ever need to earn money and to manage that money under the watchful eyes of the providers of that money? No, the ANC was used to getting money from every liberal DICK, Tom and Harry whenever they asked for it. Drug-lords, drug-addicts, scum like drug-addicted, alcoholic members of music bands, other terrorist movements and communist regimes supplied them with tons money and weapons for almost one hundred years. The ANC only had the pleasure of spending those millions, upon millions of Dollars upon themselves as they pleased. They lived in luxury abroad, in the best hotels and bought qualifications from the best universities money could buy.
The ANC never knew where a Government's money comes from and that a Government was expected to administer that money under the watchful eyes of the taxpayers and useless opposition parties.
Suddenly the ANC was surrounded by billions, upon billions, upon billions of SA Rand. Suddenly they were swimming in money. Now just imagine the likes of Al Capone and his gang in a situation like that. Just imagine a struggling, now almost bankrupt terrorist movement in a situation like that. Their eyes must have hurt and their fingers burning like fire, having access to all of that.
Could anyone blame the ANC for wanting to dig in and fill their own pockets with all that money?
Did the ANC ever have any experience in running and managing a National Defence Force, let alone a Defence Force internationally recognised as being the third-strongest Defence Force in the World, a defence force that had won one of the harshest battles since the second World War - against the combined forces of Russia, Cuba and Angola? The ANC had never even seen an Army until then. All they had were undisciplined rebels carrying stolen AK47's, which had only been used against the defenceless unarmed citizens of South Africa. The nearest thing to a bomb they had ever seen was a home-made pipe-bomb. Suddenly they were in possession of the most advanced nuclear weapons in the world. Had they been left to it they would have wiped out all of Africa.
Had the ANC before 1994 ever managed a Police force? No. Had they ever managed a National Health System? No. Had they ever been in control of anything other than undisciplined juvenile delinquents? No. They could not even control rioting school children, how could anyone expect them to rule a country?
Before 1994 the ANC had never managed anything? Even their own finances were not managed by themselves, because they were incapable of doing so. They only knew how to spend the money donated to them by hooligans. terrorists and drug-pushers from across the sick corrupt outside world.
These liberals expected terrorists to rehabilitate themselves overnight! Suddenly the ANC was left to their own resources, left alone with hundreds of billions of Rand, expected to step in from the outside and run every Government Department to the same level of efficiency that the National Party had done.
Today the liberals are cursing the ANC for their cadre deployment, but what did they expect? Today the liberals are blaming the ANC, accusing them of being corrupt, blaming the ANC for collapsing this country, but who's fault is it really? Its not the fault of the ANC, its the fault of those very same ignorant, immoral liberals who put the ANC in power in the first place.
Lets face facts, terrorists are nothing other than ruthless gangsters that plant bomb in restaurants and shopping malls with the deliberate intention of killing and maiming innocent unarmed men, women and children. They certainly cannot be regarded as upstanding honourable people who are working for the good of a country. If there was one single example, anywhere in the history of the world where this was the case, one could perhaps put the blame on the ANC, but the fact is that nowhere in the world had any revolutionary terrorist organisation ever taken over any country and made a success of it. The blame is on the liberals who never wanted to listen, because they do not have the intelligence to think for themselves.
The bottom-line is that the ANC is not to blame.
The liberals tried to fool themselves and the world by referring to the ANC as "freedom-fighters", while they were nothing other than terrorists.
The liberals promoted the ANC and individual members of the ANC to godly status. The ANC did not do this themselves. The liberal - media, churches and political leaders of the world did it.
The ANC did not present themselves as anything other than what they really were. In fact, the ANC has always been proud, to this very day, of their terrorist past. It was the liberal media, the liberal churches, the liberal politicians that presented the ANC as something other than a revolutionary terrorist movement. If the ANC was to lose power in South Africa tomorrow they would resort back to terrorism the very next day, because that is the only way they know how, it is in their very nature.
Neither Nelson Mandela, nor the ANC have to this day ever denounced violence as a means of achieving their goals, which means they have never changed. All that changed was that they register their movement as a political party, nothing more, nothing less.
If anyone is to blame for the situation in South Africa today it is the liberals. Liberals are low-intelligence, evil-minded scum that think they could take 100 men and women of different backgrounds and colours, force them together into one large hall for a year and not expect a single fight. They are too feeble-minded to understand that people are different, that people were never made to be squashed together. Not even brothers and sisters grow up without fighting. Some families break apart before the children leave home to never unite again. Take one hundred men and women, from different backgrounds and put them together for a year and see what happens. Ask anyone that has been to the army, or any group that ever went to Marion Island or Antarctica on a 18 month expedition.
Yet here in SA liberals in their immature child-like puny little minds thought that they could create the perfect rainbow nation led by a political party that was a terrorist movement the one day and a political party the next, expecting it to be the miraculous success of the world. That is why everyone constantly refers to South Africa's so-called transition as a miracle, because it would have been a miracle had it worked.
As a matter of interest the colours of a rainbow never mix, the colours never merge into the dull grey of the liberal brain, the colours of the rainbow exist in exquisitely beautiful harmony alongside one another. What do liberals and terrorists do to a rainbow? They destroy the lustre of every rainbow in their quest for the pot of gold.
So next time you blame the ANC think about this:
If you were to release convicted criminals and ruthless murderers from a prison and gave them guns, an army, control of the police, free access to other people's money and freedom to roam the streets, do not blame the criminals, blame those that gave them that opportunity.
The New South Africa was doomed from the outset, not because of the ANC, not because of the labour unions, not because the MK, but because of the ignorance of immoral liberals that thought they could change the character of undisciplined out-of-control revolutionaries by forcing them into conventional western politics.
One should feel sorry for liberals, because children deserve special attention, affection and care. Liberals are immature children that never developed intellectually or emotionally beyond the age of 12 years. Liberals view the world through the eyes of innocent, trusting children. They love paper, because money is made of paper, which is why they have so much faith in a specially printed piece of paper called a "Constitution". They actually believe that a "Constitution" is cast in steel-reinforced concrete and that the Constitution has a heart and a life of its own, capable of protecting them like an invincible Rambo or Superman. I think liberals probably love computer games and fairy-tales, because there everything always turns out well and everyone always "lives happily ever-after."
The ANC came into power and has been retaining that power based on lies (called promises) about houses to be built, free water and electricity and roads that would criss-cross the entire country. Suddenly being surrounded by so much money, the ANC, in their ignorance, thought that there was so much money they could just go out and build houses, make promises as they please and everyone would live happily ever-after. But who were behind this? You guessed it, the liberals off course, with all their fancy childlike plans and dreams of a New South African wonder-world.
What about the crime?
If Al Capone and his had become the Government of the USA, would he have targeted criminals, crime-gangs and drug-lords? Would Al Capone have been harsh on the crime syndicates? No certainly not, but what he would have done was to get back at his rivals and squash his competition.
If you were used to planting bombs in restaurants and shopping malls to kill innocent, unarmed men, women and children, would you have any remorse or feel pity for farmers being raped, stabbed, bashed and shot to death? Terrorists are used to this kind of behaviour, it is in their nature, they are trained to be ruthless in their behaviour and not have any remorse for what they did. Only liberals think that criminals, murderers, rapists, gangsters and terrorists are nice and kind people that have rights.
So how could anyone expect the ANC to view the farm murders, the excessive number of rapes, the crime, armed robberies, high-jackings and other ruthless acts as being wrong? Why should the ANC spend the money they now control on fighting crime? To them there is nothing wrong with it. The only problem is that the liberals never thought about it this way.
Everyone always thought that South Africa would never go the same way as the rest of Africa, because our people were "different". Well the problem is that it is not "our people" ruling the country. The people ruling the country are terrorist exiles that were allowed back into the country after decades of living in luxury abroad. They were not South Africans! They were foreigners that came back into the country and handed the reigns. They came back thinking that South Africa was as it was in the early 1960's when they fled.
Look at all the names of people in high places today, all the black multi-millionaires and billionaires and you will notice that they are all interconnected, the old exiles, their friends and families. The esprit de corps among the ANC was grown over decades in exile, nothing would break it, "All for one and one for all." To the ANC that is what its all about.
Somehow the liberals thought that it would be different, that these hate-filled exiles would come back with beautiful songs in their hearts, wanting to take over South Africa to build a better life for all South Africans. One really does have to pity the poor liberals living in their child-like fantasy world.
One can only be patriotic to a country if one was of that country, but are the ANC of this country? No they are not, they lived at least a third or more of their lives in foreign countries. They have no country, they only have the love of money and power. Steve McQueen explained it perfectly in The Getaway: "You wanna see what I trust? In God I trust. It's the words on the back of every bill."
The Churches and their Childish Trust
Today everyone is so disappointed and shocked by the ANC for referring to God as their saviour and protector, claiming that they would rule until Jesus returns, that they were appointed by God Himself. Today suddenly its viewed as blasphemous of the ANC to make such statements. Do liberal ignoramuses really think that terrorists pray before planting bombs to kill babies and children with? Do these liberal ignoramuses really think that training in terrorist camps are started by early morning prayer sessions? Bloody stupid fools.
Someone that truly is a Christian, that truly believes in God would not be a terrorist, because a terrorist cannot have guilt or remorse and do what he does. The ANC has been making a mockery of the Christian and every other religion, because they never were religious in any way whatsoever, yet the treacherous Dutch Reformed Church went out and blasphemously washed the feet of the ungodly.
So in conclusion we need to ask again, Is the ANC to blame?
If we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that we cannot blame it all on the ANC, because the ANC is what the ANC has always been:
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would, as a political party, have the capacity to run the country.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would, without any experience, be able to run the country.The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would change, just by registering as a political party.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would change, just by having their feet washed in church.
The blame lies with those who who painted the ANC as saints, angels, upstanding, honourable men and women.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that by pulling a rugby jersey over one's shoulders one becomes a saint.The blame lies with those who have been denying the murders, the raping, the atrocities and the genocide in this country.
The blame lies with those who have been manipulating the crime statistics and withholding the truth for the sake of money.
The blame lies with those who have been supporting Black Economic Empowerment and Transformation, in the ANC format.
The blame lies with those who turned against righteousness and supported the evils.
The blame lies with those who who called them freedom fighters.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal media.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal churches.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal politicians.
But, like every other Government, the ANC must take the blame for their own arrogance.
http://toxinews.blogspot.com/2012/05/what-went-wrong-with-new-south-africa.html
Why did the ANC not live up to the expectations of the liberal world, the liberal media, liberal politicians and liberal churches?
The world wanted the ANC to rule South Africa, at all cost. The world media criminalised the National Party Government and did everything in their power to paint the darkest most sinister and misleading image of the pre-1994 Republic of South Africa.
At the same time the media created the impression that the ANC consisted of angels directly descended from heaven.
It did not end here, as they continued this process by presenting to the world a misleading impression of this New South Africa, FW de Klerk's "rainbow nation".
According to what the media has been spreading to the rest of the world, SA is a wonderful new democracy made in (their) heaven.
Pre-1994, according to world leaders, the churches, economists and the media, the ANC was consisting of upright, upstanding, righteous, honourable angels that could only be the ultimate, most perfect and most ideal group to take over as the future Government of South Africa.
So according to the media, churches and liberals, since 1994 we have been ruled by saints.
In the New South Africa ruled by the saints of the ANC, a woman, toddler or baby is raped every 17 seconds; between 50 and 100 people are murdered every day; armed robberies are at the order of the day; farm attacks are so serious that SA Farmers are recognised as having the most dangerous jobs on earth. Today no one is safe anywhere any time in South Africa.
Our first and worst mistake is having liberals running our media, churches and opposition politics, because liberals always have and always will deny everything. Liberals are the most evil and immoral people in the world. They are gutless, spineless appeasing weasels that do not have the guts to admit their mistakes, which means that no wrongs are never addressed. Because these immoral liberal weasels are denying the atrocities in this country nothing is being done about it. They, the liberals, supported and promoted terrorists, which means that they themselves must be terrorist, not so? They have been denying the rapes and murders in this country, which means they have been causing it to worsen, indirectly supporting the raping of our women and children.
Not a single liberal, not a single church in South Africa, nor the SA media have said a word about the murders, rapes or genocide in SA. All of them have been denying it all along, trying to hide the truth from South Africans and the world to protect their beloved ANC, to promote investment in SA and promote foreign tourism. To liberals Money is always more important than lives.
Where did the saints and angels of the ANC go wrong?
Well unfortunately the ANC did not go wrong, the ANC has been what they have always been, done what they have always been doing, just being themselves.
People have very short memories and forget that, until 1994, the ANC was an internationally listed terrorist organisation. Just days before the 1994 general elections the ANC was forced to register as a Political party... against their will. The ANC refused to register as a political party and was forced to do so in order to take part in the 1994 elections. They did not want to register and only did so at the very last moment, under duress.
The ANC thought, or rather expected, to just be handed the reigns and did not even want to go through an election process to be handed those reigns. Unfortunately for them they were eventually forced to do so.
Off course the 1994 elections were declared free and fair, while we all know it was not the case. More than a million voting ballots disappeared in Pretoria alone. Hundreds of thousands of ballots of the IFP just vanished. The 1994 elections were rigged, period.
But let us for now assume that 1994 election was free and fair and that the ANC did win the election fair and square and rather consider what went wrong.
Party politics is not a patriotic political system, because party politics demand loyalty to the party, loyalty to party policies and not loyalty to the country, or loyalty to the people and their needs. Elections are nothing other than popularity contests, where he who makes the most promises and markets himself best wins, to then appoint from his ranks the most popular among them all in important positions they are unqualified for and unable to manage. Mr. Popular himself becomes the President who leads the cutest of the party puppets.
Throughout SA's history it was party policy and rigid adherence to party policy that drove us in wrong directions and caused ruling parties to continue doing the wrong thing.
The ANC has never changed.
The ANC always was a terrorist organisation. The mere fact that immoral liberals chose to call them freedom fighters and that they were forced to register as a political party, did not change the ANC, they always were and always will remain just another rebel revolutionary terrorist movement. The ANC is only a political party by virtue of the fact that it was forced to register as such. To this very day the ANC still operates in exactly the same way as they have been doing for the past one hundred years. Nothing has changed.
The poor ignorant liberal world expected the ANC to change overnight from a terrorist movement to a patriotic political party made up of honourable, upstanding, trustworthy citizens, but as expected that did not happen.
Ask any liberal if they would expect the same from the PAC today and they would not. Yet in the case of the ANC they did?
What would have happened had Al Capone and his gang taken over as rulers of the United States? Would they suddenly have changed overnight into upstanding, honourable citizens? Of course they would not have, but the world expected the ANC do so.
Would any other country in the world have allowed a group of terrorists, recently returned exiles that were spread across the world for decades, together with recently-discharged prisoners found guilty of high-treason, to take over their country? No country in the world would stand for that, yet South Africa was forced to do so.
Under normal circumstances political parties are formed and then get taken up in Government by way of elections... if they make it that far. Being part of the process, opposition parties learn the ropes and learn how Government functions, how State Departments are run and managed, decision-making processes and how the country is run. Should they be successful enough an opposition party may eventually even win an election and become the ruling party. By the time this happens the party would have gathered years of experience in Parliament and continue governing the country, without making huge sudden changes.
Did the ANC have ANY experience of Government? Did the ANC before 1994 ever serve in ANY Government, in any capacity whatsoever? No they did not. Yet the ignorant, immoral liberal world expected the ANC to just walk in and take over a first-world country and to, not only run it effectively, but to even grow and develop the country. Only an ignorant fool like a liberal could dream such ridiculous dreams.
Did the ANC in its entire one hundred years of existence ever need to earn money and to manage that money under the watchful eyes of the providers of that money? No, the ANC was used to getting money from every liberal DICK, Tom and Harry whenever they asked for it. Drug-lords, drug-addicts, scum like drug-addicted, alcoholic members of music bands, other terrorist movements and communist regimes supplied them with tons money and weapons for almost one hundred years. The ANC only had the pleasure of spending those millions, upon millions of Dollars upon themselves as they pleased. They lived in luxury abroad, in the best hotels and bought qualifications from the best universities money could buy.
The ANC never knew where a Government's money comes from and that a Government was expected to administer that money under the watchful eyes of the taxpayers and useless opposition parties.
Suddenly the ANC was surrounded by billions, upon billions, upon billions of SA Rand. Suddenly they were swimming in money. Now just imagine the likes of Al Capone and his gang in a situation like that. Just imagine a struggling, now almost bankrupt terrorist movement in a situation like that. Their eyes must have hurt and their fingers burning like fire, having access to all of that.
Could anyone blame the ANC for wanting to dig in and fill their own pockets with all that money?
Did the ANC ever have any experience in running and managing a National Defence Force, let alone a Defence Force internationally recognised as being the third-strongest Defence Force in the World, a defence force that had won one of the harshest battles since the second World War - against the combined forces of Russia, Cuba and Angola? The ANC had never even seen an Army until then. All they had were undisciplined rebels carrying stolen AK47's, which had only been used against the defenceless unarmed citizens of South Africa. The nearest thing to a bomb they had ever seen was a home-made pipe-bomb. Suddenly they were in possession of the most advanced nuclear weapons in the world. Had they been left to it they would have wiped out all of Africa.
Had the ANC before 1994 ever managed a Police force? No. Had they ever managed a National Health System? No. Had they ever been in control of anything other than undisciplined juvenile delinquents? No. They could not even control rioting school children, how could anyone expect them to rule a country?
Before 1994 the ANC had never managed anything? Even their own finances were not managed by themselves, because they were incapable of doing so. They only knew how to spend the money donated to them by hooligans. terrorists and drug-pushers from across the sick corrupt outside world.
These liberals expected terrorists to rehabilitate themselves overnight! Suddenly the ANC was left to their own resources, left alone with hundreds of billions of Rand, expected to step in from the outside and run every Government Department to the same level of efficiency that the National Party had done.
Today the liberals are cursing the ANC for their cadre deployment, but what did they expect? Today the liberals are blaming the ANC, accusing them of being corrupt, blaming the ANC for collapsing this country, but who's fault is it really? Its not the fault of the ANC, its the fault of those very same ignorant, immoral liberals who put the ANC in power in the first place.
Lets face facts, terrorists are nothing other than ruthless gangsters that plant bomb in restaurants and shopping malls with the deliberate intention of killing and maiming innocent unarmed men, women and children. They certainly cannot be regarded as upstanding honourable people who are working for the good of a country. If there was one single example, anywhere in the history of the world where this was the case, one could perhaps put the blame on the ANC, but the fact is that nowhere in the world had any revolutionary terrorist organisation ever taken over any country and made a success of it. The blame is on the liberals who never wanted to listen, because they do not have the intelligence to think for themselves.
The bottom-line is that the ANC is not to blame.
The liberals tried to fool themselves and the world by referring to the ANC as "freedom-fighters", while they were nothing other than terrorists.
The liberals promoted the ANC and individual members of the ANC to godly status. The ANC did not do this themselves. The liberal - media, churches and political leaders of the world did it.
The ANC did not present themselves as anything other than what they really were. In fact, the ANC has always been proud, to this very day, of their terrorist past. It was the liberal media, the liberal churches, the liberal politicians that presented the ANC as something other than a revolutionary terrorist movement. If the ANC was to lose power in South Africa tomorrow they would resort back to terrorism the very next day, because that is the only way they know how, it is in their very nature.
Neither Nelson Mandela, nor the ANC have to this day ever denounced violence as a means of achieving their goals, which means they have never changed. All that changed was that they register their movement as a political party, nothing more, nothing less.
If anyone is to blame for the situation in South Africa today it is the liberals. Liberals are low-intelligence, evil-minded scum that think they could take 100 men and women of different backgrounds and colours, force them together into one large hall for a year and not expect a single fight. They are too feeble-minded to understand that people are different, that people were never made to be squashed together. Not even brothers and sisters grow up without fighting. Some families break apart before the children leave home to never unite again. Take one hundred men and women, from different backgrounds and put them together for a year and see what happens. Ask anyone that has been to the army, or any group that ever went to Marion Island or Antarctica on a 18 month expedition.
Yet here in SA liberals in their immature child-like puny little minds thought that they could create the perfect rainbow nation led by a political party that was a terrorist movement the one day and a political party the next, expecting it to be the miraculous success of the world. That is why everyone constantly refers to South Africa's so-called transition as a miracle, because it would have been a miracle had it worked.
As a matter of interest the colours of a rainbow never mix, the colours never merge into the dull grey of the liberal brain, the colours of the rainbow exist in exquisitely beautiful harmony alongside one another. What do liberals and terrorists do to a rainbow? They destroy the lustre of every rainbow in their quest for the pot of gold.
So next time you blame the ANC think about this:
If you were to release convicted criminals and ruthless murderers from a prison and gave them guns, an army, control of the police, free access to other people's money and freedom to roam the streets, do not blame the criminals, blame those that gave them that opportunity.
The New South Africa was doomed from the outset, not because of the ANC, not because of the labour unions, not because the MK, but because of the ignorance of immoral liberals that thought they could change the character of undisciplined out-of-control revolutionaries by forcing them into conventional western politics.
One should feel sorry for liberals, because children deserve special attention, affection and care. Liberals are immature children that never developed intellectually or emotionally beyond the age of 12 years. Liberals view the world through the eyes of innocent, trusting children. They love paper, because money is made of paper, which is why they have so much faith in a specially printed piece of paper called a "Constitution". They actually believe that a "Constitution" is cast in steel-reinforced concrete and that the Constitution has a heart and a life of its own, capable of protecting them like an invincible Rambo or Superman. I think liberals probably love computer games and fairy-tales, because there everything always turns out well and everyone always "lives happily ever-after."
The ANC came into power and has been retaining that power based on lies (called promises) about houses to be built, free water and electricity and roads that would criss-cross the entire country. Suddenly being surrounded by so much money, the ANC, in their ignorance, thought that there was so much money they could just go out and build houses, make promises as they please and everyone would live happily ever-after. But who were behind this? You guessed it, the liberals off course, with all their fancy childlike plans and dreams of a New South African wonder-world.
What about the crime?
If Al Capone and his had become the Government of the USA, would he have targeted criminals, crime-gangs and drug-lords? Would Al Capone have been harsh on the crime syndicates? No certainly not, but what he would have done was to get back at his rivals and squash his competition.
If you were used to planting bombs in restaurants and shopping malls to kill innocent, unarmed men, women and children, would you have any remorse or feel pity for farmers being raped, stabbed, bashed and shot to death? Terrorists are used to this kind of behaviour, it is in their nature, they are trained to be ruthless in their behaviour and not have any remorse for what they did. Only liberals think that criminals, murderers, rapists, gangsters and terrorists are nice and kind people that have rights.
So how could anyone expect the ANC to view the farm murders, the excessive number of rapes, the crime, armed robberies, high-jackings and other ruthless acts as being wrong? Why should the ANC spend the money they now control on fighting crime? To them there is nothing wrong with it. The only problem is that the liberals never thought about it this way.
Everyone always thought that South Africa would never go the same way as the rest of Africa, because our people were "different". Well the problem is that it is not "our people" ruling the country. The people ruling the country are terrorist exiles that were allowed back into the country after decades of living in luxury abroad. They were not South Africans! They were foreigners that came back into the country and handed the reigns. They came back thinking that South Africa was as it was in the early 1960's when they fled.
Look at all the names of people in high places today, all the black multi-millionaires and billionaires and you will notice that they are all interconnected, the old exiles, their friends and families. The esprit de corps among the ANC was grown over decades in exile, nothing would break it, "All for one and one for all." To the ANC that is what its all about.
Somehow the liberals thought that it would be different, that these hate-filled exiles would come back with beautiful songs in their hearts, wanting to take over South Africa to build a better life for all South Africans. One really does have to pity the poor liberals living in their child-like fantasy world.
One can only be patriotic to a country if one was of that country, but are the ANC of this country? No they are not, they lived at least a third or more of their lives in foreign countries. They have no country, they only have the love of money and power. Steve McQueen explained it perfectly in The Getaway: "You wanna see what I trust? In God I trust. It's the words on the back of every bill."
The Churches and their Childish Trust
Today everyone is so disappointed and shocked by the ANC for referring to God as their saviour and protector, claiming that they would rule until Jesus returns, that they were appointed by God Himself. Today suddenly its viewed as blasphemous of the ANC to make such statements. Do liberal ignoramuses really think that terrorists pray before planting bombs to kill babies and children with? Do these liberal ignoramuses really think that training in terrorist camps are started by early morning prayer sessions? Bloody stupid fools.
Someone that truly is a Christian, that truly believes in God would not be a terrorist, because a terrorist cannot have guilt or remorse and do what he does. The ANC has been making a mockery of the Christian and every other religion, because they never were religious in any way whatsoever, yet the treacherous Dutch Reformed Church went out and blasphemously washed the feet of the ungodly.
So in conclusion we need to ask again, Is the ANC to blame?
If we are honest with ourselves, we have to admit that we cannot blame it all on the ANC, because the ANC is what the ANC has always been:
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would, as a political party, have the capacity to run the country.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would, without any experience, be able to run the country.The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would change, just by registering as a political party.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that the ANC would change, just by having their feet washed in church.
The blame lies with those who who painted the ANC as saints, angels, upstanding, honourable men and women.
The blame lies with those who blindly believed that by pulling a rugby jersey over one's shoulders one becomes a saint.The blame lies with those who have been denying the murders, the raping, the atrocities and the genocide in this country.
The blame lies with those who have been manipulating the crime statistics and withholding the truth for the sake of money.
The blame lies with those who have been supporting Black Economic Empowerment and Transformation, in the ANC format.
The blame lies with those who turned against righteousness and supported the evils.
The blame lies with those who who called them freedom fighters.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal media.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal churches.
The blame lies with those who did not think for themselves, but allowed themselves to be led by the liberal politicians.
But, like every other Government, the ANC must take the blame for their own arrogance.
http://toxinews.blogspot.com/2012/05/what-went-wrong-with-new-south-africa.html
Friday, May 11, 2012
Violent and Hate Crime
There is a lot of horrific crimes in South African over the past few years
that makes one think that our only solution to the rampant crime is capital
punishment, but with an inefficient and corrupt criminal justice system and
government, what can one expect?
South Africa is heading for a disastrous future. The ANC are incompetent, short sighted and loaded with corruption. Crime is everywhere, especially in the farming areas, as well as the low socio economic areas where people get murdered on a daily basis. We need a more efficient criminal justice system as convictions take ages. We need the death penalty? Why because I know for a fact that crime/murder will decrease because these murderers will think twice before killing somebody....at the moment they don't think twice because IF they get caught they get 3 meals a day, room + bed, tv etc all at our expense for a few years then get released on good behaviour knowing that they are now hardened criminals and will stop at nothing to do what they do best crime/murder.
I am a educated black person that knows exactly how these people think- I have come across them and listened to the way they speak and they are something out of a horror story. They murder farmers because they dislike them because certain government leaders sing and chant hate songs against white people. Dubula ibhulu is not a joke, it promotes these crimes to the incompetent person in the poor areas. So instead of them going to rob you and leave you unharmed, they know that the ANC and its comrades endorse Dubula Ibhulu which means kill the white man/farmer...so, unfortunately they will do what they have been told to do even though they might get a prison sentence which means nothing to them They do it because they are looked up to in their communities/gangs. I'm sorry to say this, but I warn you all to arm yourselves especially if you are a farmer and defend yourselves because you cannot rely on the cops or the courts! I feel very sorry for the farmers and all the people that get murdered in South Africa. The government has failed on so many levels. The ANC(African National Corruption) don't care about you and never will. Either a new competent government takes over or we just live in fear and misery!
Without the death penalty the only fear of committing a crime is a jail sentence and that's if criminals get caught & convicted because our courts are inefficient and backlogged! Considering how many crimes are committed by repeat offenders this is not even a deterrent any more. Jail is simple not scary enough. What scares anyone, including hardened murderers, is death. Having this ultimate form of punishment in place shows that truly heinous crimes cannot and will not be tolerated in civil society
There in an economical benefit too for introducing the death penalty. The Department of Correctional Services spends millions of tax rands on keeping these criminals in jails, money that could be invested in other sectors like education. If most of these barbarians were to be convicted and killed, we would not have to spend money on them. South African is not a rich country and we have a lot of people still living below the poverty line (i.e. not able to afford 3 meals a day like the criminals in jails). So how about we take that money and do something useful with it instead of wasting it on criminals who, after getting bailed out, commit the same crimes again. This "correctional service" is not working and has been nothing but an embarrassing money wasting exercise.
Our criminal justice system/courts is another major problem. It favours more the wrongdoer than the victim. The constitution also favours the rich in South Africa and that is why organised crime has increased drastically in South Africa. If you have money then you can obtain the best and highest paid legal team that will bend backwards to ensure these organised criminals remain free to roam and commit more crimes in South Africa. In actual fact the government has failed the South African citizens by allowing the mafia into the country to set up shop to do what they do best, organised crime! The unfortunate truth is that South African white people are too complacent to do anything constructive about this. You all moan and groan about problems in SA and the crimes which I agree is shocking, but you never protest or do anything constructive to stop this madness. South Africans in general are too materialistic and self centered to start a revolution for a positive future!
You must be the change you want to see in the world and that should be a psoitive one for all. The bottom line is that, unless we have a better justice system, crime will keep on increasing with criminals knowing there will be no consequences. One can just look at Zimbabwe that was once the breadbasket of Africa. Such a shame to a once beautiful and prosperous country. I just hope South Africa doesn't turn into something similar with the current useless leaders & government, but I tend to think that things are not looking bright for SA. Zimbabwe will now, out of stupidity, bribes, & arrogance, get 'colonised' by China- a new era of colonialism that's coming there way and the whole of Africa for that matter! Times will be tough in Africa....most people are too oblivious for now!
We could also mention that our population, especially in poverty stricken areas is increasing exponentially! With that happening, unemployment, poverty, crime will only increase especially with our government not providing decent education to the masses. The government needs to implement family planning education, possibly free contraception. Otherwise the more unemployed, uneducated people =problems create problems= it seems our government likes chaos! Our unsustainable economy & corrupt government with their materialistic and self centered lifestyles, coupled with our explosive population growth in Africa, is a recipe for a well earned disaster!
Here is a link to prove that South Africa and Southern Africa are probably the most murderous societies on earth, even with the probable under-reporting. A very informative link that just shows how bad things really are http://www.frontline.org.za/articles/gettingaway_withmurder.htm
http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Violent-and-Hate-Crime-20120510
South Africa is heading for a disastrous future. The ANC are incompetent, short sighted and loaded with corruption. Crime is everywhere, especially in the farming areas, as well as the low socio economic areas where people get murdered on a daily basis. We need a more efficient criminal justice system as convictions take ages. We need the death penalty? Why because I know for a fact that crime/murder will decrease because these murderers will think twice before killing somebody....at the moment they don't think twice because IF they get caught they get 3 meals a day, room + bed, tv etc all at our expense for a few years then get released on good behaviour knowing that they are now hardened criminals and will stop at nothing to do what they do best crime/murder.
I am a educated black person that knows exactly how these people think- I have come across them and listened to the way they speak and they are something out of a horror story. They murder farmers because they dislike them because certain government leaders sing and chant hate songs against white people. Dubula ibhulu is not a joke, it promotes these crimes to the incompetent person in the poor areas. So instead of them going to rob you and leave you unharmed, they know that the ANC and its comrades endorse Dubula Ibhulu which means kill the white man/farmer...so, unfortunately they will do what they have been told to do even though they might get a prison sentence which means nothing to them They do it because they are looked up to in their communities/gangs. I'm sorry to say this, but I warn you all to arm yourselves especially if you are a farmer and defend yourselves because you cannot rely on the cops or the courts! I feel very sorry for the farmers and all the people that get murdered in South Africa. The government has failed on so many levels. The ANC(African National Corruption) don't care about you and never will. Either a new competent government takes over or we just live in fear and misery!
Without the death penalty the only fear of committing a crime is a jail sentence and that's if criminals get caught & convicted because our courts are inefficient and backlogged! Considering how many crimes are committed by repeat offenders this is not even a deterrent any more. Jail is simple not scary enough. What scares anyone, including hardened murderers, is death. Having this ultimate form of punishment in place shows that truly heinous crimes cannot and will not be tolerated in civil society
There in an economical benefit too for introducing the death penalty. The Department of Correctional Services spends millions of tax rands on keeping these criminals in jails, money that could be invested in other sectors like education. If most of these barbarians were to be convicted and killed, we would not have to spend money on them. South African is not a rich country and we have a lot of people still living below the poverty line (i.e. not able to afford 3 meals a day like the criminals in jails). So how about we take that money and do something useful with it instead of wasting it on criminals who, after getting bailed out, commit the same crimes again. This "correctional service" is not working and has been nothing but an embarrassing money wasting exercise.
Our criminal justice system/courts is another major problem. It favours more the wrongdoer than the victim. The constitution also favours the rich in South Africa and that is why organised crime has increased drastically in South Africa. If you have money then you can obtain the best and highest paid legal team that will bend backwards to ensure these organised criminals remain free to roam and commit more crimes in South Africa. In actual fact the government has failed the South African citizens by allowing the mafia into the country to set up shop to do what they do best, organised crime! The unfortunate truth is that South African white people are too complacent to do anything constructive about this. You all moan and groan about problems in SA and the crimes which I agree is shocking, but you never protest or do anything constructive to stop this madness. South Africans in general are too materialistic and self centered to start a revolution for a positive future!
You must be the change you want to see in the world and that should be a psoitive one for all. The bottom line is that, unless we have a better justice system, crime will keep on increasing with criminals knowing there will be no consequences. One can just look at Zimbabwe that was once the breadbasket of Africa. Such a shame to a once beautiful and prosperous country. I just hope South Africa doesn't turn into something similar with the current useless leaders & government, but I tend to think that things are not looking bright for SA. Zimbabwe will now, out of stupidity, bribes, & arrogance, get 'colonised' by China- a new era of colonialism that's coming there way and the whole of Africa for that matter! Times will be tough in Africa....most people are too oblivious for now!
We could also mention that our population, especially in poverty stricken areas is increasing exponentially! With that happening, unemployment, poverty, crime will only increase especially with our government not providing decent education to the masses. The government needs to implement family planning education, possibly free contraception. Otherwise the more unemployed, uneducated people =problems create problems= it seems our government likes chaos! Our unsustainable economy & corrupt government with their materialistic and self centered lifestyles, coupled with our explosive population growth in Africa, is a recipe for a well earned disaster!
Here is a link to prove that South Africa and Southern Africa are probably the most murderous societies on earth, even with the probable under-reporting. A very informative link that just shows how bad things really are http://www.frontline.org.za/articles/gettingaway_withmurder.htm
http://www.news24.com/MyNews24/Violent-and-Hate-Crime-20120510
De Klerk and Mandela
F.W. de Klerk, the last leader of white South Africa, who joined with Nelson Mandela to bring an end to apartheid and shared a Nobel Peace Prize for their achievement, was recently interviewed at a summit of Nobel Laureates in Chicago and appeared on Thursday’s Amanpour.
So I’m a Convert
It was noted that Mandela had once called de Klerk “a man of integrity” but had taken it back, regretting that de Klerk had never renounced the principle of apartheid.
De Klerk responded: “Well, let me first say I’m not aware that Mr. Mandela says I’ve never renounced apartheid.” He then said, “I have made the most profound apology in front of the Truth Commission and on other occasions about the injustices which were wrought by apartheid.”
But then he added: “What I haven’t apologized for is the original concept of seeking to bring justice to all South Africans through the concept of nation states (essentially creating two separate states, one black and one white).”
“But in South Africa it failed,” he said. “And by the end of the ‘70’s, we had to realize, and accept and admit to ourselves that it had failed. And that is when fundamental reform started.”
He was then asked if apartheid failed because it was unworkable, or because it was simply morally repugnant.
“There are three reasons it (apartheid) failed,” he said. “It failed because the whites wanted to keep too much land for themselves. It failed because we (whites and blacks) became economically integrated, and it failed because the majority of blacks said that is not how we want our rights.”
Still, De Klerk would not back off his belief in the validity of the original concept of “separate but equal” nation states.
“There is this picture that apartheid was…used to be compared to Nazism,” said de Klerk.
“It’s wrong, and on that, I don’t apologize for saying that what drove me as a young man, before I decided we need to embrace a new vision, was a quest to bring justice for black South Africans in a way which would not – that’s what I believed then – destroyed the justice to which my people were entitled.”
“That’s how I was brought up,” said de Klerk. “And it was in an era when also in America and elsewhere, and across the continent of Africa, there was still not this realization that we are trampling upon the human rights of people. So I’m a convert.”
Eleven official languages
Again, he was asked if he wanted to take the opportunity to say that apartheid was, in retrospect, morally repugnant.
“I can only say in a qualified way,” said de Klerk. “Inasmuch as it trampled human right, it was – and remains – and that I’ve said also publicly, morally reprehensible.” He added, “But the concept of giving as the Czechs have it and the Slovaks have it, of saying that ethnic unities with one culture, with one language, can be happy and can fulfill their democratic aspirations in an own state, that is not repugnant.”
“With the advantage of hindsight,” said de Klerk, “we should have started the reform much earlier…But the intention was to end at a point which would ensure justice for all. And the tipping point in my mind was when I realized… we need to abandon the concept of separateness. And we need to build a new nation with its eleven official languages, accommodating its diversity, but taking hands and moving forward together.”
We call each other on birthdays
Mandela, will turn ninety in July and de Klerk was asked if they were friends.
“Actually, we’re close friends,” said de Klerk. “Not the closest in the sense that we see each other once a week. Also, we live apart. But he’s been in my home as a guest; I’ve been in his home as a guest. When I go to Johannesburg, my wife and I have had tea with him and Graca, his wife.”
“We call each other on birthdays,” he said. “There is no animosity left between us.” But then he added: “Historically, there was.”
http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/10/de-klerk-no-animosity-with-mandela/
So I’m a Convert
It was noted that Mandela had once called de Klerk “a man of integrity” but had taken it back, regretting that de Klerk had never renounced the principle of apartheid.
De Klerk responded: “Well, let me first say I’m not aware that Mr. Mandela says I’ve never renounced apartheid.” He then said, “I have made the most profound apology in front of the Truth Commission and on other occasions about the injustices which were wrought by apartheid.”
But then he added: “What I haven’t apologized for is the original concept of seeking to bring justice to all South Africans through the concept of nation states (essentially creating two separate states, one black and one white).”
“But in South Africa it failed,” he said. “And by the end of the ‘70’s, we had to realize, and accept and admit to ourselves that it had failed. And that is when fundamental reform started.”
He was then asked if apartheid failed because it was unworkable, or because it was simply morally repugnant.
“There are three reasons it (apartheid) failed,” he said. “It failed because the whites wanted to keep too much land for themselves. It failed because we (whites and blacks) became economically integrated, and it failed because the majority of blacks said that is not how we want our rights.”
Still, De Klerk would not back off his belief in the validity of the original concept of “separate but equal” nation states.
“There is this picture that apartheid was…used to be compared to Nazism,” said de Klerk.
“It’s wrong, and on that, I don’t apologize for saying that what drove me as a young man, before I decided we need to embrace a new vision, was a quest to bring justice for black South Africans in a way which would not – that’s what I believed then – destroyed the justice to which my people were entitled.”
“That’s how I was brought up,” said de Klerk. “And it was in an era when also in America and elsewhere, and across the continent of Africa, there was still not this realization that we are trampling upon the human rights of people. So I’m a convert.”
Eleven official languages
Again, he was asked if he wanted to take the opportunity to say that apartheid was, in retrospect, morally repugnant.
“I can only say in a qualified way,” said de Klerk. “Inasmuch as it trampled human right, it was – and remains – and that I’ve said also publicly, morally reprehensible.” He added, “But the concept of giving as the Czechs have it and the Slovaks have it, of saying that ethnic unities with one culture, with one language, can be happy and can fulfill their democratic aspirations in an own state, that is not repugnant.”
“With the advantage of hindsight,” said de Klerk, “we should have started the reform much earlier…But the intention was to end at a point which would ensure justice for all. And the tipping point in my mind was when I realized… we need to abandon the concept of separateness. And we need to build a new nation with its eleven official languages, accommodating its diversity, but taking hands and moving forward together.”
We call each other on birthdays
Mandela, will turn ninety in July and de Klerk was asked if they were friends.
“Actually, we’re close friends,” said de Klerk. “Not the closest in the sense that we see each other once a week. Also, we live apart. But he’s been in my home as a guest; I’ve been in his home as a guest. When I go to Johannesburg, my wife and I have had tea with him and Graca, his wife.”
“We call each other on birthdays,” he said. “There is no animosity left between us.” But then he added: “Historically, there was.”
http://amanpour.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/10/de-klerk-no-animosity-with-mandela/
It's time to let our leaders know they've gone too far
Everyone who follows South African politics with any enthusiasm knew that 2012 would be an interesting year, but with seven months to go before Mangaung, "interesting" has taken on an oriental connotation.
Apparently, "may you live in interesting times" is not really a Chinese curse but, whoever is responsible, we do seem to have been so cursed this year.
Now, with the official laundering of Lieutenant-General Richard Mdluli's record and reputation and the possibility that he may be in line to become the top cop, I fear we have moved from interesting to extremely dangerous.
Just about everyone who is privileged to have this sort of space to write in has tried to sound the alarm about Mdluli's return as crime intelligence chief after a long suspension on unresolved charges ranging from kidnapping and murder to corruption and fraud.
In a country where corruption, nepotism and political manipulation make the news almost every day, writers are running out of ways to signal the depth of their alarm at this development.
Business Day editor Peter Bruce took the rare step this week - a newspaperman's cris de coeur - of writing a front page editorial opinion on the topic.
Many newspapers have reported on Mdluli's alleged letter to President Jacob Zuma in November claiming the charges against him were the work of hostile conspirators and promising: "In the event that I come back to work, I will assist the president to succeed next year."
There was then and is now only one thing on Zuma's agenda this year, and that is to get himself re-elected as president of the ANC and guardian-in-chief of the feeding trough.
There is also a growing body of new evidence that, in addition to the charges against Mdluli, he abused previously unreported police funds for private purposes.
Glynnis Breytenbach, a deputy director of public prosecutions who had filed an extensive report on Mdluli's activities, has been suspended, allegedly on unrelated charges, and has been shot at.
As head of crime intelligence, Mdluli has the keys to the skeleton cupboard. He knows or can find out who among his friends and foes is seeing, talking to, sleeping with or giving business to which other of his friends and foes.
According to DA spokesman Dianne Kohler Barnard, his answer to one of her parliamentary questions revealed he is also the only person with the power to authorise phone taps, which means he can listen in on anyone, and no one can listen in on him.
Seen in isolation, the unexplained withdrawal of such a range of charges against him, his return to such a powerful position, his alleged crude pledge of a political payback and rumours he might become our commissioner of police, are cause for alarm and despondency.
But coming on top of the Zuma government's broad assault on the independence of our watchdog institutions and the abuse of the state's influence over business, they are nothing short of terrifying.
We have seen Willie Hofmeyr, the single most committed and successful corruption -buster in our history, fired as head of the Special Investigating Unit and replaced by a series of unsuitable successors.
We have seen the independence of the judiciary challenged and the credibility of the Judicial Service Commission dented by the rejection of many of the country's best jurists as candidates for the bench, and the politically assisted appointment of an inappropriate chief justice.
Provinces, cities and towns have been saddled with unqualified and often tainted administrators placed to tilt the political balance in Zuma's favour with no thought of the consequences of their inaction or incompetence in office.
The government has spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of rands trying to impose flawed secrecy legislation that will undermine the free flow of information despite overwhelming evidence that it is popular only with the security establishment.
Business worth billions has been funnelled to friends and relatives of the president and his clique, sometimes, as in the case of the Aurora mine, at direct cost to the lives of the workers the government purports to serve.
We have reason to be very worried that the race for the power that will be decided in Mangaung will fatally damage the democratic state so carefully built by people, including many in the ANC, who are now silent.
But we do not have to accept what is happening. We are still a democratic state and a free nation.
The public response to the Protection of State Information Bill and to the imposition of punitive tolls on Gauteng highways shows South Africans are finding the voice that earned them their freedom.
Though often inappropriately destructive, the actions we call service delivery protests show South Africans have not given up hope for better things.
It is clear that Zuma and his inner circle feel only contempt for the people who do the work and pay the nation's bills and for those who wish they could.
It is time to drop the constraints of respect for authority and to let the ANC leaders who either lead or allow the pillaging of our state know they have gone too far.
We don't need to wait for 2014 when we next get to vote. We can do it as we have in our response to censorship and excessive taxation. We can shout our opposition and we should.
http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2012/05/10/it-s-time-to-let-our-leaders-know-they-ve-gone-too-far
Apparently, "may you live in interesting times" is not really a Chinese curse but, whoever is responsible, we do seem to have been so cursed this year.
Now, with the official laundering of Lieutenant-General Richard Mdluli's record and reputation and the possibility that he may be in line to become the top cop, I fear we have moved from interesting to extremely dangerous.
Just about everyone who is privileged to have this sort of space to write in has tried to sound the alarm about Mdluli's return as crime intelligence chief after a long suspension on unresolved charges ranging from kidnapping and murder to corruption and fraud.
In a country where corruption, nepotism and political manipulation make the news almost every day, writers are running out of ways to signal the depth of their alarm at this development.
Business Day editor Peter Bruce took the rare step this week - a newspaperman's cris de coeur - of writing a front page editorial opinion on the topic.
Many newspapers have reported on Mdluli's alleged letter to President Jacob Zuma in November claiming the charges against him were the work of hostile conspirators and promising: "In the event that I come back to work, I will assist the president to succeed next year."
There was then and is now only one thing on Zuma's agenda this year, and that is to get himself re-elected as president of the ANC and guardian-in-chief of the feeding trough.
There is also a growing body of new evidence that, in addition to the charges against Mdluli, he abused previously unreported police funds for private purposes.
Glynnis Breytenbach, a deputy director of public prosecutions who had filed an extensive report on Mdluli's activities, has been suspended, allegedly on unrelated charges, and has been shot at.
As head of crime intelligence, Mdluli has the keys to the skeleton cupboard. He knows or can find out who among his friends and foes is seeing, talking to, sleeping with or giving business to which other of his friends and foes.
According to DA spokesman Dianne Kohler Barnard, his answer to one of her parliamentary questions revealed he is also the only person with the power to authorise phone taps, which means he can listen in on anyone, and no one can listen in on him.
Seen in isolation, the unexplained withdrawal of such a range of charges against him, his return to such a powerful position, his alleged crude pledge of a political payback and rumours he might become our commissioner of police, are cause for alarm and despondency.
But coming on top of the Zuma government's broad assault on the independence of our watchdog institutions and the abuse of the state's influence over business, they are nothing short of terrifying.
We have seen Willie Hofmeyr, the single most committed and successful corruption -buster in our history, fired as head of the Special Investigating Unit and replaced by a series of unsuitable successors.
We have seen the independence of the judiciary challenged and the credibility of the Judicial Service Commission dented by the rejection of many of the country's best jurists as candidates for the bench, and the politically assisted appointment of an inappropriate chief justice.
Provinces, cities and towns have been saddled with unqualified and often tainted administrators placed to tilt the political balance in Zuma's favour with no thought of the consequences of their inaction or incompetence in office.
The government has spent hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of rands trying to impose flawed secrecy legislation that will undermine the free flow of information despite overwhelming evidence that it is popular only with the security establishment.
Business worth billions has been funnelled to friends and relatives of the president and his clique, sometimes, as in the case of the Aurora mine, at direct cost to the lives of the workers the government purports to serve.
We have reason to be very worried that the race for the power that will be decided in Mangaung will fatally damage the democratic state so carefully built by people, including many in the ANC, who are now silent.
But we do not have to accept what is happening. We are still a democratic state and a free nation.
The public response to the Protection of State Information Bill and to the imposition of punitive tolls on Gauteng highways shows South Africans are finding the voice that earned them their freedom.
Though often inappropriately destructive, the actions we call service delivery protests show South Africans have not given up hope for better things.
It is clear that Zuma and his inner circle feel only contempt for the people who do the work and pay the nation's bills and for those who wish they could.
It is time to drop the constraints of respect for authority and to let the ANC leaders who either lead or allow the pillaging of our state know they have gone too far.
We don't need to wait for 2014 when we next get to vote. We can do it as we have in our response to censorship and excessive taxation. We can shout our opposition and we should.
http://www.timeslive.co.za/opinion/columnists/2012/05/10/it-s-time-to-let-our-leaders-know-they-ve-gone-too-far
Sunday, May 6, 2012
ANCYL’s Latest Village Idiot
By Mike
Smith
3rd of May 2012

Let me introduce you to the ANCYL’s latest village idiot, the new Malema. His name is Ronald Lamola …and he is on the warpath.
Last night at the ANCYL meeting at the University of Cape Town, he said that the ANC should unapologetically pursue the changing of the constitution so that mines can be nationalized and white owned property expropriated.
He continued his rhetoric against “White monopoly capital” and said that it is in the interest of Whites to redistribute their prosperity...”
In a direct attack against the billionaire entrepreneurial family, the Ruperts, he added that, “…otherwise we cannot be held responsible if the farms of the Ruperts are invaded.”He said that, “The ANCYL leaders will not abandon the struggle for economic freedom”.
Economic freedom in Communist Newspeak means the day they have stolen everything from whites.
He said that: “White people who own land are holding the ANC government at ransom.”
He also said that: “Universities should be transformed to further the ANC agenda.”
What exactly that agenda is, he did not say.
He said that: “the only way blacks are going to become part of the economy is through the nationalization of the mines and the expropriation of white owned farms.”
He added that the ANCYL were always allowed to be “naughty”.
“We should be allowed to do things that adults normally won’t do”…
Die Burger report: Share your wealth or we will take it by force
Several things out of his speech struck me. First he admitted what we have always known and said right here on this blog, that the ANC has an “agenda”.
That agenda includes the economic dispossession of whites and driving them either into abject poverty or out of the country through the nationalization of mines and the stealing of white owned farms.
Apart from that, this idiot made himself guilty of the vilest hate speech against whites, threats of violence and theft of their property, intimidation and a declaration of war. Why is he still allowed to walk free? Should he not be in prison?
Nobody in the ANC condemned him, so I take it they approve of everything he said. Just like they always approved of everything Julias Malema said.
Like I said yesterday, nothing keeps blacks from taking part in the economy. In fact they have all the laws of BEE and AA on their side. After eighteen years there is nothing holding them back to start businesses and become prosperous.
But I suppose it is easier to sit on your arse and blame whites for all the evils of the ANC.
I have said it before and I will say it again. The ANC is spoiling for a race war. Almost daily they spew their hatred in the faces of White South Africans. Below are just a few examples of their hate speech and declarations of war against the whites of South Africa.
"When Mandela dies we will kill you whites like flies" - Mzukisi Gaba (ANC councilor and politician at the Provincial government of the Western Cape.)
“Kill the Boer - Kill the Farmer” - Peter Mokaba (Murdered ANC populist)
“Stealing from whites is not a crime” – Faraday Nkoane, Leader of the Uhuru culture club.
“I have beaten the Colonials - and I am going to beat the children of the children of the Colonials” - Julius Malema (ANC youth leader)
“Kill them- Kill the Amaburu” - song by the ANC and Mandela
“All whites are racists” - Dept. Minister Fikile Mbalula
“Whites will be threatened with a revolution by black people if the racial quotas are not met” - Jimmy Manji (Black management forum leader)
“We are here today to declare war. We are against violence, but if this is what it takes to force a bad farmer in a direction, then they should be smashed (moered) in that direction. If farmers continue to violate the rights of our workers like mad dogs then we need to beat them until they stop. They are going to shit if they do not stop.” - Tony Ehrenreich – Cosatu leader in the Western Cape.
“There is already blood on the farm workers and unless it stops there will be blood on the farmers of these farms. We will grab the land and give it to the rightful owners.” - Tony Ehrenreich – Cosatu leader in the Western Cape.
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2012/05/anc-youth-league-acting-president-share.html
3rd of May 2012

Let me introduce you to the ANCYL’s latest village idiot, the new Malema. His name is Ronald Lamola …and he is on the warpath.
Last night at the ANCYL meeting at the University of Cape Town, he said that the ANC should unapologetically pursue the changing of the constitution so that mines can be nationalized and white owned property expropriated.
He continued his rhetoric against “White monopoly capital” and said that it is in the interest of Whites to redistribute their prosperity...”
In a direct attack against the billionaire entrepreneurial family, the Ruperts, he added that, “…otherwise we cannot be held responsible if the farms of the Ruperts are invaded.”He said that, “The ANCYL leaders will not abandon the struggle for economic freedom”.
Economic freedom in Communist Newspeak means the day they have stolen everything from whites.
He said that: “White people who own land are holding the ANC government at ransom.”
He also said that: “Universities should be transformed to further the ANC agenda.”
What exactly that agenda is, he did not say.
He said that: “the only way blacks are going to become part of the economy is through the nationalization of the mines and the expropriation of white owned farms.”
He added that the ANCYL were always allowed to be “naughty”.
“We should be allowed to do things that adults normally won’t do”…
Die Burger report: Share your wealth or we will take it by force
Several things out of his speech struck me. First he admitted what we have always known and said right here on this blog, that the ANC has an “agenda”.
That agenda includes the economic dispossession of whites and driving them either into abject poverty or out of the country through the nationalization of mines and the stealing of white owned farms.
Apart from that, this idiot made himself guilty of the vilest hate speech against whites, threats of violence and theft of their property, intimidation and a declaration of war. Why is he still allowed to walk free? Should he not be in prison?
Nobody in the ANC condemned him, so I take it they approve of everything he said. Just like they always approved of everything Julias Malema said.
Like I said yesterday, nothing keeps blacks from taking part in the economy. In fact they have all the laws of BEE and AA on their side. After eighteen years there is nothing holding them back to start businesses and become prosperous.
But I suppose it is easier to sit on your arse and blame whites for all the evils of the ANC.
I have said it before and I will say it again. The ANC is spoiling for a race war. Almost daily they spew their hatred in the faces of White South Africans. Below are just a few examples of their hate speech and declarations of war against the whites of South Africa.
"When Mandela dies we will kill you whites like flies" - Mzukisi Gaba (ANC councilor and politician at the Provincial government of the Western Cape.)
“Kill the Boer - Kill the Farmer” - Peter Mokaba (Murdered ANC populist)
“Stealing from whites is not a crime” – Faraday Nkoane, Leader of the Uhuru culture club.
“I have beaten the Colonials - and I am going to beat the children of the children of the Colonials” - Julius Malema (ANC youth leader)
“Kill them- Kill the Amaburu” - song by the ANC and Mandela
“All whites are racists” - Dept. Minister Fikile Mbalula
“Whites will be threatened with a revolution by black people if the racial quotas are not met” - Jimmy Manji (Black management forum leader)
“We are here today to declare war. We are against violence, but if this is what it takes to force a bad farmer in a direction, then they should be smashed (moered) in that direction. If farmers continue to violate the rights of our workers like mad dogs then we need to beat them until they stop. They are going to shit if they do not stop.” - Tony Ehrenreich – Cosatu leader in the Western Cape.
“There is already blood on the farm workers and unless it stops there will be blood on the farmers of these farms. We will grab the land and give it to the rightful owners.” - Tony Ehrenreich – Cosatu leader in the Western Cape.
http://mikesmithspoliticalcommentary.blogspot.com/2012/05/anc-youth-league-acting-president-share.html
Cost of Zuma’s wives, children nearly doubles
CAPE TOWN — The cost to the taxpayer of support for President Jacob Zuma ’s wives and children almost doubled in 2009-10, soaring to more than R15m from R8m a year before, according to figures released by the Presidency yesterday.
Speculation has been rife since Zuma came to power over the cost of his extended family, both during his term and once he has left office, and whether this would include children born from extramarital relations.
Yesterday, in response to a question from Democratic Alliance parliamentary leader Athol Trollip, Minister in the Presidency Collins Chabane said that in 2008-09 the spousal office budget was R8,076m while the adjusted budget for 2009- 10 was R15,517m. The spousal office in the Presidency provides support and benefits to spouses and children of the president.
When Trollip asked what the expenses and benefits enjoyed by Zuma’s wives and children were, Chabane provided guidelines .
“Although the spouses have no constitutionally defined roles, obligations or responsibilities and as such are not remunerated by the state, they are, however, expected to provide support to the President in the execution of his duties, and specifically at state and official functions. In addition, the spouses may fulfil other official functions in support, and in the interest, of the Republic.
“The state provides all reasonable administrative, logistical and other support to the spouses to enable them to meet these responsibilities in a manner that permits them actively to pursue their own careers and interests if they so desire. The state also may provide reasonable logistical support to the spouses to assist with the day-to-day logistical arrangements of dependent school- going children in the household,” Chabane said.
He said that staff were allocated to spouses and these included a private secretary and a researcher. Administrative requirements were also met.
Chabane said: “Expenses covered for spouses by the Presidency therefore include the following: personal support staff — secretary and researcher; domestic air travel and accommodation and international air travel and accommodation for official visits abroad approved by the President; cellular phones for spouses and their secretaries; equipment such as laptops and printers; and special daily allowances for incidental expenses during official journeys.”
Dependent children of the president are defined as being under the age of 18, but under the age of 27 if studying full-time.
“The dependent children of the President may collectively utilise up to 60 single domestic economy class flights per annum to visit and reunite with their parents within the country at the cost of the Presidency. This figure is regardless of the total number of qualifying children. Travel costs beyond the allotted tickets are to be borne by the President.”
If a child minder has to accompany a child younger than eight, then the tickets come from the allocated 60.
Chabane said the policy applied to all the president’s children regardless of whether he was married to the mother.
http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=103788
WYNDHAM HARTLEY |
Published:2010/03/17 06:32:04 AM
|
CAPE TOWN — The cost to the taxpayer of support for President Jacob Zuma ’s wives and children almost doubled in 2009-10, soaring to more than R15m from R8m a year before, according to figures released by the Presidency yesterday.
Speculation has been rife since Zuma came to power over the cost of his extended family, both during his term and once he has left office, and whether this would include children born from extramarital relations.
Yesterday, in response to a question from Democratic Alliance parliamentary leader Athol Trollip, Minister in the Presidency Collins Chabane said that in 2008-09 the spousal office budget was R8,076m while the adjusted budget for 2009- 10 was R15,517m. The spousal office in the Presidency provides support and benefits to spouses and children of the president.
When Trollip asked what the expenses and benefits enjoyed by Zuma’s wives and children were, Chabane provided guidelines .
“Although the spouses have no constitutionally defined roles, obligations or responsibilities and as such are not remunerated by the state, they are, however, expected to provide support to the President in the execution of his duties, and specifically at state and official functions. In addition, the spouses may fulfil other official functions in support, and in the interest, of the Republic.
“The state provides all reasonable administrative, logistical and other support to the spouses to enable them to meet these responsibilities in a manner that permits them actively to pursue their own careers and interests if they so desire. The state also may provide reasonable logistical support to the spouses to assist with the day-to-day logistical arrangements of dependent school- going children in the household,” Chabane said.
He said that staff were allocated to spouses and these included a private secretary and a researcher. Administrative requirements were also met.
Chabane said: “Expenses covered for spouses by the Presidency therefore include the following: personal support staff — secretary and researcher; domestic air travel and accommodation and international air travel and accommodation for official visits abroad approved by the President; cellular phones for spouses and their secretaries; equipment such as laptops and printers; and special daily allowances for incidental expenses during official journeys.”
Dependent children of the president are defined as being under the age of 18, but under the age of 27 if studying full-time.
“The dependent children of the President may collectively utilise up to 60 single domestic economy class flights per annum to visit and reunite with their parents within the country at the cost of the Presidency. This figure is regardless of the total number of qualifying children. Travel costs beyond the allotted tickets are to be borne by the President.”
If a child minder has to accompany a child younger than eight, then the tickets come from the allocated 60.
Chabane said the policy applied to all the president’s children regardless of whether he was married to the mother.
http://www.businessday.co.za/articles/Content.aspx?id=103788
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)